2007-02-14 23:11:20 · 14 answers · asked by kaddick 1 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
For me personally, I think it was wrong. Who is to say that the Americans had the right to go in and capture him and then kill him? If our job is to kill inhumane and cruel dictators or leaders of other countries than I could think of 3 others that need to be murdered by America.
2007-02-15 06:05:18 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is purely relative. All rulers are similar in their actions. Here Mr. Sadam did his best effort to uplift the nation. Of-course any ruler will do the maximum to keep his regime. Here the method adopted to trail Mr Sadam was not correct.
2007-02-15 07:30:16 · answer #2 · answered by JAIKISH P 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well murder is always wrong. Saddam execution was wrong, because the trial was no way fair, and we really had a responsibility to ensure that he had a fair trial especially since we called him a dictator.
And the execution was more like a lynching, and in essence we martyred him therefore creating a potentially bigger problem.
2007-02-15 07:19:57 · answer #3 · answered by Nikki 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Welllllllllllll........ strictly speaking he diserved it killing 160 people ain't exactly what you call a roll model but on the other hand there's Mr Bush lookin' for more resources to munch on and there's some mistery revolving around why they wanted to finish him off so quickly. I'd say the murder was not justified although he deserved it.
2007-02-16 05:40:09 · answer #4 · answered by God sent 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Murders
1. Che Guevera
2. Idi Amin
3. Mahatma Gandhi
4. Saddam Hussein
5. Indira Gandhi
These are immortals
2007-02-15 07:15:53 · answer #5 · answered by JJ 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
We all knows what happen so Will it matter to bring this Question up?
Suddenly not a right Choice but for those who Saddam's have killed by his commends i think yes there is innocence people diet with his Order.
We all say Blood for Blood so it will not give any goods now.
2007-02-15 07:17:33 · answer #6 · answered by james l 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it was absolutely wrong.It was just the revenge taken by Bush for his father.Saddam had done some illegal things but on the other hand he also highly contributed for the upliftment of his country.Above all Bush had no right to invade his country,arrest him and publically hung him.If Saddam is deserved to be hunged then Bush also deserves the same b,coz he kill millions of lfes in Afghanistan and Iraq.
2007-02-17 09:27:57 · answer #7 · answered by danu 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think it's pretty unfair to invade in some body's house & make him a prisioner & then kill him.
wt is he doing in his own house nobody cares as he is strong enough to challange anybody.
who is he to give him the punishment.
everyhuman in the world as some positive & neagtive aspects but that doesn't mean u can kill for ur own selffish interest
so according to me wt ever was done on him is all wrong
2007-02-15 07:30:45 · answer #8 · answered by bobby 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes from my point of view saddam's punishment was what he desirved for his cruelity & mass killing's of jew's.we can't call it a murder but a decision made by the court of iraq for his cruelity.
2007-02-15 07:23:39 · answer #9 · answered by bakalu 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wrong he did the best for his country.
2007-02-15 07:22:15 · answer #10 · answered by Gorilla 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋