Or are the three options possible?
Thanks.
2007-02-14 21:19:51 · 9 answers · asked by bouha 1 in Education & Reference ➔ Primary & Secondary Education
None of your choices is grammatically correct.
If 3D TV existed, or if we were writing science-fiction, the correct term would be:
three-dimensional TV.
2007-02-14 21:27:34 · answer #1 · answered by mary4882 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's TV it only has two dimensions.... I would say Three dimensional TV
2007-02-14 21:23:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
We do have internal clocks. The problem with all the senses are their limitations. Eyes will only see in a very narrow band of radiation. Ears? The same. But yeah, some of the atoms in your body and mine and everything out there were forged in the big bang. Others (most, really) were created later in stars and supernovae. Yes, the stars took those early hydrogen and helium atoms created in the big bang, tore them apart, and created new, heavier elements. This pushed the array of elements up to iron. Supernovae were needed to create higher elements. I'm not saying anything you're not saying, dude. I'm just laying the emphasis somewhere else.
2016-05-24 02:45:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think none of the above is right.I would call it a three-dimensional TV (3D) instead.
2007-02-14 22:23:59 · answer #4 · answered by minton 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think the proper analigy is 3 demensional tv
2007-02-14 21:38:24 · answer #5 · answered by david w 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
its three dimensional TV isn't it
2007-02-14 21:27:58 · answer #6 · answered by Nick H 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
three dimensional T.V
2007-02-14 21:28:55 · answer #7 · answered by DB23 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Call it a holograph
2007-02-14 21:22:45 · answer #8 · answered by LuckyChucky 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the first one sounds rite
2007-02-14 21:21:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋