The DNA testing was not reliable, how could they know for sure that it was Anna's tissue it could have been someone elses because they supposedly "found" it 10 years after her death and also the hair could have been cut from that missing Poland girl's relatives.
How could Anna not be Anastasia, she looks exactly like her. Even the tests that she was given that only Anastasia could have known she passed with flying colors. And ofcourse she's going to have hard time remembering some things, she went through a terrifying trauma for crying out loud she witnessed her family being killed! If I went through that I would probably end up psychotic and not talk anymore. And why were the Red guards looking for Anastasia in homes after they killed the family?
If she was really Anastasia it must have been so sad to be rejected by some of her relatives and by most of the world. What do you think?
2007-02-14 21:12:24 · 8 answers · asked by ஐPardon Me while I burnஐ Incubus 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
ANNA ANDERSON WAS ANASTASIA
1.Dna test WAS corrupted
2.She knew intimate detail about Tsars household
3.British Govt conspired with family survivors to deny her because Tsars fortune had previously been sent to London for safekeeping during WW1
2007-02-15 00:19:25 · answer #1 · answered by jb1 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
I think they are one in the same, the resemblence and mostly the facts that Anna knew are uncanny. It is interesting to note that two bodies were missing from the remains found; that of Alexei, the only son, and Anastasia. Some accounts say it was actually Marie that escaped, not Anastasia. I also read that it is possible that the bones unearthed in 1991 weren't the royal family's at all. There are plenty of websites with lots of information, but unfortunetely until some proper DNA testing is done, it's an individual decision.
2007-02-14 21:34:00 · answer #2 · answered by kimora 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
RE: was Anna Anderson really Anastasia? was Anna Anderson really Anastasia?
2016-05-24 02:45:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a subject that has interested me for many years and I am not convinced that there wasn't a conspiracy to cover her true identity. It would not be in the best interest of the British monarchy or government for her to have been identified as Anastasia given that they both refused to allow either the Tsar or his family refuge in Britain.
2007-02-14 21:18:14 · answer #4 · answered by jemima 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Of course she wasn't. You are obviouly clutching at straws.
Gibbes, Anastasia's former English teacher, recognised the story as complete nonsense. She insisted she hold a piece of paper in front of her face while he was interviewing her LOL - but even then he saw her ear didn't have the slight malformation Anastasia's did.
2007-02-14 23:23:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Anna was Anna and Anastasia was Anastasia, and that's that.
2007-02-14 21:16:54 · answer #6 · answered by emiliosailez 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
She was not. DNA tests conducted after her death confirmed she was not a member of the Romanov family.
2007-02-14 22:58:19 · answer #7 · answered by Bullwinkle Moose 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I don't know what to say, God knows better than us; the most important is to pray for the souls of those that died!
2007-02-14 21:45:50 · answer #8 · answered by tatal_nostru2006 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋