Yes. We are sh?t at the minute. At least he can cross, take corners and free kicks - and when he does it gives you hope that we might score.
The last 2 games I watched were awful.
At least David brought some class to the team. He has passion too.
I think it is rotten not letting him reach 100 caps too.
I think that Mclaren just wanted to make a point because people used to say Sven was ruled by Becks.
2007-02-15 06:06:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by tray 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes.
Though he might not play, his presence and his leadership gives the england team a foundation to work around. His passing is still ever as great, and though he lacks fitness and (as always) the ability to run at defenders (as apposed to Aaron Lennon), his presence will surely give McClaren's men a boost.
I know england are pushing for youngsters and the future... but there will be no future without a present!
I mean, c'mon, it can't get any worse than it is now?
What's gonna happen, is McClaren going to waste another friendly?
David Beckham's inclusion in the squad will enhancve training and enhance the general feeling within the squad
What has McClaren got to lose??
Hope this helps
2007-02-14 20:38:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. People should stop thinking that the reason England are performing badly is because Beckham is missing. Its more to do with the fact that Terry, Owen, J.Cole, A.Cole, Hargreaves etc are missing through injury. Once they are back we will have a much stronger team and it will be clear that we don't need Beckham.
2007-02-14 23:24:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by theearlof87 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
YAWN what number cases is this question going to be asked the info are he can no longer play ninety minutes for England as he confirmed interior the cup he's no longer enjoying adequate first group soccer he is going to play soccer in a minor league he's greater attracted to his advertisement paintings now his performances recently have been sturdy for Madrid yet can he save on all and sundry grew to become into calling for him to be dropped after the international cup fiasco and his Madrid style has quite lots constantly been consistent and sturdy i'm no longer completely anti Beckham if he have been to be referred to as up he could be a bench participant in trouble-free terms it will be a shame if he can no longer get to a hundred caps after being so close to he continues to be a large passer and set piece participant yet I truthfully have severe reservations as to his well-being
2016-10-02 04:16:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Erika 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
David Beckham couldn't do any worse than the currant England team, at least he can cross the ball and takes a great free kick and i think he should be Captain again.
2007-02-15 03:57:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by the dog 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO! He should end his carreer like all the greats. Move to California with his no talent wife so she can pretend she can act. Nearly bankrupt a Los Angeles Team that he plays in .He will go down in disgrace rather than retire in dignity. We already stolen Wayne Gretsky from Canada and ruined him and Hockey for L.A..
Besides, why do you care. Your Irish.
2007-02-14 20:49:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
if he's playing for Madrid and then yes. England need him and he might just be the secret of macca keeping the job. so yes its worth a try
2007-02-14 21:49:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Frihah Anti-Milanist 4lyf! 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
yeah we do need him back to put those crosses in but macclaren don't want him in the team again.
the armband was the only thing keeping him in.
hope it helps.
2007-02-14 20:52:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
yes he can still preform a job, forget the person, as a footballer hes the best on dead balls.
2007-02-14 22:08:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
No, stop and try acting
2007-02-14 20:55:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋