English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I mean really. His credibility is ZERO. Read his latest spew of putrid barf.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070215/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush

Hey Bush, I have an idea; YOU DIE IN THE WARS YOU START and leave our children OUT OF THEM.

Agree/Disagree?

2007-02-14 20:23:08 · 22 answers · asked by sirdoctorfine 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

22 answers

I don't think he thinks we are anything. I don't think he thinks of us at all. He considers himself lord and almighty ruler of the USA and his wishes, no matter how foolish or reckless should be done. His agenda has nothing to do with the good or wellbeing of the people of this country. He is the most dangerous terrorist in the world. This man should be impeached immediately before he gets us into WW3 with this antics. He has no credibility and he is leading this country into utter destruction. At this point, I am not even sure we can recover from Bush.

2007-02-14 20:35:58 · answer #1 · answered by kolacat17 5 · 6 6

No, I think that he is probably aware that most Americans are smarter than he is. In fact, a toadstool is probably smarter than he is. That is why he puts out the image that he doesn't care what people think or what the polls say. Basically, he has let everyone know that he is going to do it his way and if we don't like it, too bad. He is afraid that someone might have a better idea and that he won't get the credit for it. Bush is only out to push his own agenda and that of his supporters. If lives have to be lost to achieve it, so be it.

2007-02-15 05:06:32 · answer #2 · answered by snackfairy06 4 · 2 2

You know, after being a part of Y!A since December, and after reading all the negative anti-Bush comments has almost...almost makes me sympathize with the Man. But then again, I think of how this war started, and all the mistakes, blunders, misfortunes, and again, I think "Hey, Saddam is gone", but the fact of the matter is the man who started all this (other than Cheney) IS STILL RUNNING LOOSE....His name is Usama Bin Laden!!!! It is a monumental failure of US intelligence and the White House leadership that he has not been captured or killed. The mission in Afghanistan should have been completed first. From that perspective to the entire military machine of the US was "retarded", not just King George. I was against the Iraqi War from the beginning for that very reason. The second reason is because I knew that the basis for fighting was not accurate, plus it was and is a known fact that Saddam HATED Iran and Bin Laden, and vice versa. He was a military buffer between Iran and the rest of the Middle East. He held them in check. As for Saddam being a threat, we had control of 2/3's of his air space, and by the way, Israel can easily take care of themselves. Look out, Ahmadinejad, and don't talk yourself into a nuclear attack. King George and Court Jester Cheney has stumbled, misstepped, stuttered, and shot themselves into a corner. It's their war and legacy to lose, unfortunately, our's, too.

BRING 'EM HOME!

2007-02-15 05:12:12 · answer #3 · answered by gone 6 · 2 3

One thing that concerns me is this. While most people are focused on what is going on over seas.....are you even aware of the things that are taking place right in front of your eyes here at home? Like the Trans-Texas Super Corridor and the NASCO project?
And no...he was not elected by the people in the last election. It is proven on tape(video)....that the election was rigged. But I guess nobody cares??? Maybe that is why he thinks the people are retarded. Because most times that is the way people act! They are truly ignorant of much needed facts.

2007-02-15 09:16:20 · answer #4 · answered by TexasRose 6 · 0 1

The Bush family paradigm going all the way back to Prescott who funded the Nazi war machine and camps, is that we are all like farm animals for their benefit.. Their motto is "If God did not want them sheared, He would not have made them sheep." He treats Congress and other countries with the same contempt saying to all of us "you are either with us (me) or you are siding with the terrorists." This is pure fascism to divide us in that fashion. Given that now 80% of us don't agree with him, that means 80% of us must be on the side of the enemy. These men mean us harm, and the sooner we recognize that the better.

2007-02-15 07:16:34 · answer #5 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 2 2

Agree and Disagree hmmmm? Good question? But it won't work!
The old saying about people only think about what they believe and see what they see? Well that is Bush, he is retarded and he thinks everyone else is as well! And his enormous ego with the backing of all his puppeteers routing him on makes him think he is pulling the wool over our eyes? But he isn't and I think he is getting it now? But he is like a snake and he will wiggle around till he coils again and then strikes us from behind! He is a snake make no mistake about it? How else could he have defeated Saddam? Saddam was an insane maniac not worthy of all this hub bub and turmoil eh? We could have gotten him without that mafia styled leader of ours that made a hullaballoo out of it and gave us a TV war with an enormous amount of over kill with his sales pitches and reduntancy about the war on terror, just like his father's monotony about the war on drugs! The needle is stuck on their record man! He is a manipulating jerk that I would not buy into a word his squirrlly mouth would spew out! But I know when he says something how to read it and I also know to think of all the angles of why he is saying it? He tries feebly at being a magician and plays the hand tricks as well! Total chaotic tendancies to confuse you while he is doing something to promote the forward motion of the New World Order and his partners in Crime are the Saudis! Look at what the Saudis just did? They brokered a deal with the Palestinians and that means they want to share profits with Israel with the Palestinians. Ultimately Like Hitler, Bush is going to try to get the Israelis to go for this deal and that would mean the end of Israel for sure! So if the Israelis turn and say no! Watch Bush climb on board and show his true loyalties are with the Arabs and then you will know the truth! WTC? hmmm? And if the Israelis go for it, they will be doing just what the Rothchilds did here when Hitler bargained with them for money he killed 6 million jews with their investments in a liar and a thief! So we shall see right?
Be prepared that our president is a traitor and it won't be the first time, just this time we will catch him and hopefully impeech!

2007-02-15 04:43:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 5

Tell you what...if you're so good at everything, enlist and go protect them from allllllllllllllll the militants and after you've single-handily annihilated them, and quelled sectarian violence, come on back and we'll reward you with never having to pay taxes again.

THE WHITE HOUSE HAS ALREADY SAID 25 TIMES THAT WE'RE NOT GOING TO IRAN. BUT IF THOSE FORCES ARE FOUND WITHIN THE IRAQI BORDER, THEY WILL BE SHOT.

The congress will not supply more troops because we do not have them...none...that 21,500 is the last of the military the U.S. can send. Why don't you quit complaining...I have family there too for over a year. Try praying and not complaining. This wasn't a draft...this was voluntary.

2007-02-15 04:34:44 · answer #7 · answered by chole_24 5 · 8 5

Bush does not give a rats behind whay we think he has his on adgenda and the vision he is told to have by the puppet masters he serves ,which aint us

2007-02-15 05:53:49 · answer #8 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 3 1

Bush doesn't care. Absolute power corrupts...absolutely..he is hoping he can keep the fear instilled in the american people long enough to fullfill his agenda and carry out "his" vision.

2007-02-15 07:33:27 · answer #9 · answered by joymlcat 3 · 1 1

Would you still say it was "putrid barf" if it was Gore or Kerry saying the same things? I'm pretty sure it wouldn't be, and I'm equally certain that you would NOT be saying that.

Even implying that a sitting president should die is a federal crime.

Soldiers VOLUNTEER, say it with me, VOLUNTEER to serve. They know what they're getting themselves into. NO president has ever fought in ANY war he's "started." Why should we start with President Bush? It's called NATIONAL SECURITY.

And before you (or anyone else) can say anything implying that I only said that last part because no one I know serves, my husband is US Army.

Edit: It appears that SOME people have absolutely no respect for the military, or their family members. My husband is going to Iraq in November. I don't even want to hear it from ANYONE that I'm the sort of person who would send "anyone" except for the people I love. I'm not even trying to stop my husband from going.
Oh, and I'm NOT a Republican, thank you. My voter's registration card says I'm not affiliated with EITHER party.

2007-02-15 04:31:15 · answer #10 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 9 8

fedest.com, questions and answers