Brazil, France, Portugal,Germany and Argentina were the better team but they failed. Italy still managed to win the cup.
2007-02-14 19:41:00 · 19 answers · asked by suresh_nair13 1 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ Other - Football
Brazil is yet to win the World Cup in Europe, so let's get to other(England, France, Italy, Spain, Germany, Argentina,amongst the so said faves) teams.... and we see that their chances were......equal!
Yes, because if you follow their route to the World Cup finals, you will see that theirs was somewhat identical to 1982(the SCANDAL and their LUCK) but the teams they had to face were beaten in between themselves(France beat Brazil and Germany beat Argentina, England beat Portugal) such a neutralization lead to only one team emerging... ITALY!
they only had to face France and Germany as teams and then they had enough skills and luck to win the Cup
..............and maybe because am an ITALY fan!!!
2007-02-14 20:08:27 · answer #1 · answered by K@rân 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
listen juventina, you cant base how solid a crew is on the type of global cups they have because the communities are continually replacing and the crew that gained the international cup in 1950 is definitely no longer an similar crew that gained that tumbler in 2000 (hypothetical dates). certain, the type of global cups can allow you to understand that the crew has been continually solid. besides the undeniable fact that, italy would have gained, yet what in the adventure that they dont even get previous the crew round in 2010?! and basically because italy gained the international cup doesnt advise theyve saved up their prevailing streak. as a rule....take a inspect their placement in the euro 2008 qualifiers....you would imagine they may well be on the right of their crew and they honestly are not any further. at the moment, in accordance to new youthful gamers, modern rankings in accordance to suits performed, etc, argentina is definitely in a more beneficial advantageous position than italy. little question.
2016-12-04 05:02:47 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because they have the best coach, lipi! besides they have the most undrerated players like Pirlo, Bufon, nesta, Totti. Compared to the underachievers Lampared, Gerared, Beckham, Rooney, Ronaldo, Andriano, Ronaldinho.
2007-02-14 21:01:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's the beauty of football isn't it?
And I don't exactly agree with your statement, footballl isn't decided on paper -- its what happened on the pitch.
Though yes, Italy were lucky to go through at times, but really, they defended superbly and improved steadfastly.
Ultimately, they won it this time around.
What other "good team" can say that?
Hope this helps
2007-02-14 20:45:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because the scoring system in Association Football (soccer) is inherently flawed. Too much rides on the goal and not enough on the skill of the players.
2007-02-14 19:49:18 · answer #5 · answered by Gnomon 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They just got LUCKY! I think that Argentina could have beaten France without having to go through penalties.
2007-02-14 21:52:15 · answer #6 · answered by Rahima Liverpool 4 life 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the best team doesnt necessarly win because u have to have a good team ,luck and destiny on your side.thts why italy won .
2007-02-14 19:45:30 · answer #7 · answered by RAZ 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your question can be answered just by looking at what is currently happening within Italian soccer. Its full of scandals. Day after day its something new.Its a shame that money these days can buy anything!Including sport.
2007-02-14 23:32:30 · answer #8 · answered by stabra 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe you can say luck...but i tink tat Italy win because they rocks n they r a great team...because i great fan of Italy...lol
2007-02-14 19:57:10 · answer #9 · answered by icyboy 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Italy might not have been the best but they had something the rest didn't.
Passion. Passion will outdo any skilled team.
cheers
2007-02-14 19:46:32 · answer #10 · answered by H Vice 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋