In the case of Iran, Bush does not want another war. He will just issue more sanctions, or call in an air strike with our new F-35's.
In the case of N. Korea, The Six-Party talks have come up with a deal that says that N. Korea will stop making nukes in exchange for resources. Just keep watching CNN, they may talk about it sometime.
In the case of Russia, Putin just made a statement without thinking I guess.
In the Case of China, WTF did China do to upset Bush?!! They're helping the US with the N. Korea problem! Where the **** did you get such a dumb idea?
2007-02-14 22:04:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
that's no longer Russia he's fearful about. Russia is on the border with China. only a hop pass and infrequently any bounce away with a million/4 of the worlds inhabitants with a quickly growing to be understanding in hi tech. China might want to swarm Russia over nighttime almost. The playing cards on the table now might want to be....what's the danger from N. Korea ? What are the Iranians as a lot as for his or her lengthy determination plans.? Will Israel strike first as a " preventive strike against Iran.? if so what often is the placement of the U.S. if Israel starts a war with Iran.? what is going to ensue even as Turkey starts up a war with the Turks. The Turks are allies and are contributors of NATO. So shall we get this strait. Turkey attacks the Kurds in IRAQ. the position the U.S. is engaging in warfair. What then.? i might want to pass on and on. yet my time is maximum helpful. proper desires, timber
2016-11-03 12:18:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush looking excuses ti invade Iran. What do Iran & Iraq has in common? Oil...
Others country like South Korea and China, He is not intersted. just show off to everyone that he do agree with nuke program
2007-02-14 18:48:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by anderson 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Bush never said he wants to go to war with Iran; however, if Iran does not stop sending arms to Iraq then Bush may order a series of air strikes or cut off off their economy more severely than now. The US would stop every boat going into Iran and not only seize armament but also other important imports.
2007-02-14 18:32:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Bush is stupid like his father. The decision to use the atomic bomb was a tough one, but it ended a war that could have gone on a long time without it. Iran, China, N. Korea are unstable countries. It has taken them this long to figure out how to make the "bomb", what are the odds of them using it against the U.S., France, England? Who in those countries decide to "drop the bomb"? One person? Two? Ten? A committiee?? ONLY ONE! What if that nut decides he doesn't like Canada Ginger Ale any more and bombs Canada? Then the US bombs China, then Russia bombs the US....when does it end?
2007-02-14 18:38:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by drew 4
·
4⤊
2⤋
Makes sense to me. We should invade any Country we believe to be in posession of weapons of mass destruction who are not directly allied with the United States, or in NATO. If you don't think we should invade North Korea or Pakistan, than you should think twice about who lucky you are, and how quickly our lives could change if we didn't have such a strong government and military. America follows the greatest policy in the world, the big stick policy, as made famous by President Roosevelt.
You are a whiny liberal, wake up and see how superior our country is, or move to Iraq.
2007-02-14 18:33:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by teddy 2
·
3⤊
2⤋
I think the sequence will be
- Iran, for obvious reason and we are publicly making claims and building up a case for it.
- Syria, it has been on the list since the invasion on Iraq. Claims were made about the weapon of mass destruction smuggled into Syria through border. We were going to go in. Since we are in the neighborhood, Israel may just want us to clean up the area for them.
- N. Korea, obvious reasons, and pushed by Japan and south Korea
- China, because Taiwan, Japan want us to beat China up. And we see them as a threat for competition for now and future. We may just well beat them while they are 30 years behind us in technologies. We have been openly critise them and gradually building case.
- Pakistan, we are saying the Pakistani government is weak in getting rid of the terrorist, we may just go in and get rid of their nuclear arsenals. Indian will be supporting the effort in this.
I am sorry to say this, seems like we are sustained by wars. We are 9 Trillions in debt. Our jobs are outsourced to other countries. Our deficit is growing. Politicians don't want you to pay attention to this problem, so they create other distractions.
People from defense industries and special interests are lobbying for their benefits, especially oil and defense spending. Our "allies" are asking us get rid of their rival neighbors.
Do you foresee we will ever stop ?
2007-02-14 18:53:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
If you look at the word Iraq and take off the q and put an n in its place, it makes the word Iran. I think maybe someone should look into this, maybe make a documentry about it.
2007-02-14 18:42:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by boats mcgee 1
·
2⤊
1⤋
The chemical and nuclear armament that the US has - have always been a deterrence for country's trying to meddle in our business or attacking us. You, we, would have been witnessing a different lifestyle today, not for the US shock and awe powers.
2007-02-14 18:47:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Who knows?
I still say that if the draft were re-instituted the people of America would put a stop to his perpetual wars.
.
2007-02-14 18:47:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Brotherhood 7
·
0⤊
2⤋