Do you think President Bush should be impeached for lying about the war and now trying to save face by?

Question

blaming his debacle in Iraq on Iran?

Answer 1

we all lie... the show must go on

Answer 2

If you can impeach a President for lying about oral sex, you should be able to impeach a President for lying about a reason to go to war and then sending thousands of young men and women to die. And now, he's trying to distract the American public by picking on Iran (which is a bad idea). I say, why don't you clean up your first mess, before making another.

Answer 3

Yes and with his 32% latest all time low polls he's going to use Iran as a pretext for yet another war . Russia and China have a stake in Iran as was proven when they both backed Iran during the Iraq / Iran war while we backed Saddam . There is no telling how far this man will go to ruin this country. He probably feels another dumb stunt as going to war with someone else will rally the country around the flag till he's out of office and has left us holding the bag.

Answer 4

This country needs to LET IT GO!....we don't need the expense of it.! It will be hard to prove intent on his behalf even if we already know the answer. This president made our bed and now we are stuck with it. We can't just go off and leave Iraq open for Iran, Syria, or any other country to walk in and give those poor people "WHAT FOR" because our president messed up! It's ours now.

Answer 5

There are 500 contributors of congress who voted to stay away from to conflict. 2 bipartisan committees counseled going to conflict. Bush would want to now no longer have positive optimal of congress through asking them to "trust him." we've all learn the Hillary and Kerry prices declaring that they strongly supported us going to conflict. Bush isn't Yoda, he did now no longer use a Jedi suggestions trick to steer a u . s . and both houses of congress in a bipartisan call to conflict. each and each and every individual believed the documents provided to them. They relied on bill Clinton declaring he grew to grow to be into particular WMD's existed and explaining why Saddam grew to grow to be into this variety of intensive threat. Plus he would want to have dedicated criminal acts to face impeachment. He can declare those judgements weren't lies, yet were the most suitable judgements he can make with the documents accessible to him. As president he has to comprehend lots he would want to position self assurance in briefings and tests from those who will be triggered through prejudices, using reality they are people. No President can comprehend each and every aspect about each and each and every and each and everything he's anticipated to comprehend about. There are diverse prices he can face impeachment over, yet mendacity isn't one in each and every of them.

Answer 6

Yes. He should have been impeached. But any effort to impeach bush must also include plans to imeach cheney, rise, gates, and gonzales. Pelosi 07!

Answer 7

I'm from Canada and i just feel bad for the USA when Hillery gets in you Guyz will be back to normal

Answer 8

First of all ,What debacle?, and the answer to your question is NO, The opposition hasn't enough balls to impeach such a power.

Answer 9

Good advise, we do not know the details, it may be best to stay out of politics.

Answer 10

The Iran story is true....The Presidency has cried wolf too many times for the general populus to believe it anymorre.

Answer 11

Entertainment and Music?