right or wrong, we didn't invade iraq to cure them of corruption--that's the one excuse that hasn't been given! invading mexico? no way. their problems are so far beyond iraq's. the entire country is based on two factors--the drug trade and the money sent 'home' by aliens working here--which is their second biggest source of revenue, behind oil. Mexico could have been, should have been, the leader ofthe third world. the natural resource potential is unrivaled in the western hemisphere. the corruption there is ingrained and chronic, chronic to the point that it is fatal to thousands each year. i could go on and on but its late and i've made my point. we would have nothing togain by invading another cesspool.
2007-02-14 18:50:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by rickmcconaghy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
better to let bush invade the USA.
we haven't won a war since 1945 (ww2)
we could use the money rather than Iraq.
2007-02-15 02:13:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by cork 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
well they have election fraud and so do we. It wouldnt work anyway since a significant percentage of american troops are hispanic and I doubt seriously they would kill their families. I dont think invading anyone is a good idea in general.
2007-02-15 02:07:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is probably support for it Just seal the border I don't support an invasion of Mexico
2007-02-15 02:10:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by hobo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
do what they did on 9/11, just setup a fake terrorist attack and then you'll have your reason to invade. Go get em tiger, you just leave us harmless Canadians alone and we'll be your best est friend in the whole wide world. Please don't tell Bush I said fake terrorist attack.
2007-02-15 02:10:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
America is a republic, not a democracy.
2007-02-15 02:22:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋