Media love to create hype (mostly based on 0 to 20% truth) to draw the attention of the public. But people are not fool. Ultimately media lose credibility. Readers and viewers just think that most of the TV channels and newspapers are run by bunch of fools. Because they have power and money bags behind them therefore they are able to run the show.
People really get pained to read and listen when the media calls Shahrukh Khan the king of Bollywood while there are young heroes who are giving better hits and performing much better. Media think that by telling lies it can make the people believe that a lie is the real truth.
Most of the viewers or readers want to cry when media show utter foolishness of comparing Shahrukh Khan with Amitabh Bachchan's acting talent. People already know that if Shahrukh know ABC in acting the great Amitabh Bachchan is master of A to Z in acting. The big B is an institution in himself.
KingSolomin
www.TheWritersOnline.com
2007-02-14 16:25:05 · 22 answers · asked by King Solomin 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
I totally agree with you.
2007-02-14 16:31:09 · answer #1 · answered by Indian at heart 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I agree with you that SRK cannot be termed as King Khan. If anyone who can be called King Khan of Acting, it should Aamir Khan who over and time again has shown a great talent in acting. SRK does not even have a touch of his acting.
As long as comparing him with Big B, that comparison is also senseless. Amitabh is a legend and SRK is monotonous in all his movies. Never saw a stunning performance from him in any of his movies. Same acting from his first movie till KANK. Where is the variety Mr. SRK???
2007-02-14 16:48:06 · answer #2 · answered by AB2874 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I appreciate your boldness. SRK is like a child. He can never be a great actor. Only child-minded people will call him a good actor. Hritik Roshan, Salman Khan, Abhishek Bachchan, Amir Khan etc are much better then phoney media created King Khan.
Can Shahrukh act like Hritik did in Dhoom2? Can he be great Guru like Abhishek? Can he be wonderful like Amir Khan in Rang De Bansati? SRK is creation of luck and foolish people. In KBC is boring the people to hell.
People will forget him in coming years like they forgot so many. But Amitabh Bachchan will be in the golden history of mankind. He is so talented that it is difficult to fully utilise his talent.
2007-02-14 16:49:06 · answer #3 · answered by Miss Anita 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Media may write 101 things about celebrities but there is no smoke without a fire. OK? SRK knows acting. He may not be compared to the big B but in his own style, he is a King. People are not fools to vote for him just because somebody has written about him in the media. The people see his films and they are the ones who are responsible for the sucess or flops of films. Don't criticise unnecessarily. Big B and SRK are different. Both have failures and successes. No need to break our minds on them.
2007-02-14 16:32:56 · answer #4 · answered by sunilbernard 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
SRK became the king khan just by pure LUCK! right things happened to him at the right moment.. he was the 1st to give the indian audience what they wanted.. for years thr was no one to beat him.. not beat his acting, talent.. but his pure "presense"
Definatelty, he's nowhere close to actors like saif ali, abhishek, ritesh etc.. they performances they give is real "acting".
I am too, unhappy, with SRK taking away all the limelight. For years, it was just SRK that people worshipped.. But now u ask anybody who their fave actor is.. n u'll get to hear anything but the so called "king Khan". Thats a relief!
But, true, there's one thing u cant deny, we wouldnt have had HINDI MOVIES for the last 20 years.. if Srk wasnt a part of bollywood!
Atleast give the KHAn credit for that!
2007-02-14 20:34:30 · answer #5 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You are right....SRK doesnt know the acting. He is just kid in acting yet....Actualy his style and energy level is good. But those things are not sufficient to be an actor. He always try to wear Amitabh Bachchan's Shoes, but fails everytime.....Don and KBC are examples.
An Actor has to be well versed in all shades of acting like Actiion/Emotion/Romance/Comedy. But SRK lacks most of the Acting departments. He is good only in Romantic movies. Emotions and Actiong is not his cup of coffee.
2007-02-16 16:22:12 · answer #6 · answered by The Answering Machine 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
hello i too am amitabh die hard fan and i somewhat agree with u but srk is good in romantic films and i dont like srks acting too but yes his dance and some what his style i like . and kbc hosted by srk i dont like at all and yes he is lucky and many people r his fan but its their choice and ur right amitabh himself is a institution of acting he is toooooooooo goooood .
and there r many actors better then srk like aamir khan, hrithik roshan ,but they dont get that credit which i pity but its destiny and becoz of kbc rating down now the media is writing and showing gooodie goodie of srk so his fan following may increase but for intelligent people they cant fool us .
any ways for me amitabh will always be the best
2007-02-14 23:02:06 · answer #7 · answered by simran 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only those people support SRK as a good actor who does not the difference between a stone and a jewel.
Great Editor
www.newdelhitimes.net
2007-02-14 17:24:54 · answer #8 · answered by Great Editor 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
With maximum of solutions i'm no longer likely to characteristic something new. yet bascially this nick call and different nick names of Bollywood stars, cutting-edge and previous, have not got any meaning in any respect. in actuality one Bollywood famous person become as quickly as asked why you're called...., he become greatly surprised and stated he become no longer conscious of his nickname in any respect and stated the nick call doesnt mirror his character. case in point, Dharmendar is termed Gharam Dharam, yet once you spot he has accomplished maximum of romantic video clips so properly, (Dreamgirl, Blackmail) and yet his 'indignant guy' place become in easy terms projected. SRK become called Shah of Blah as he keeps on conversing with no lead to sight. yet so do the best purchase of Bollywood heroes. properly this nick call in my opinion in easy terms potential that he's p.c.. of the lot of Khans at cutting-edge in the fray. His contemporaries. further movie going for Mumbaites is like eating or respiration. They stay the flicks they see. each and every individual identifies himself with the Hero and by surprise sooner or later some nickname is given with the help of the filmworld to a individual. i'm undecided if SRK will comprehend why he's termed as such.
2016-09-29 03:32:41 · answer #9 · answered by aharon 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Have you seen dilwale dulhania? or kuch kuch hota hai? or baazigar? ok, just go and refresh your brain with those. there's a reason those films were hits and while great script, story and a steller actress definately help, you also need someone who can really act as the hero in such emotional movies or people wouldn't have liked them!
I guess i'm definately behind king khan on this one! and while i like abhishek and all, i think people tend to think he's better at acting then he really is cuz his dad's amitabh and i think you're doing the same thing.
2007-02-15 07:56:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anarkali 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
im sorry but i dont agree with u there he is the best actor, i love all his movies, they have humour, aggression, and love in all of them. he is good in positive rolls as well as negative rolls, maybe its b cos sharuk and amitabh have played along side each other in many films and they can make a good movie together like kabhi kushi kabhi gham.
2007-02-18 03:17:06 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋