Great Britain and United States get the lowest ranking for children because they are being neglected since the parents are all busy with their jobs, sports and other activities.
2007-02-14 16:37:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think both the U.S. and Britian got the lowest ratings because of the illegal alien problem in both countrys. The sap the nations resourse leaving less to spend on welfare of the children. There are probably many other factors, one being that the mother of the family in both country has to have an income and work leaving little time for family matters.
2007-02-14 16:41:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Just blunders and slip-ups with human errors in kicking the butts of their own children in planet of apes.
Hope the men who crowned themselves as the men who would be king look into the mess they created for themselves in planet of apes.
The blunders and slip-ups with human errors was created back in the past after independence being expose with time.
Exodus 20.5
See why we have to come up with a yellow ribbon for Iraq in cleaning up the mess that had been created back in the past?
2007-02-14 19:57:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
WTF!!??! its glaring ure nt going to p.c. an answer frm a british individual, somewhat ure gonna anticipate sum1 as narrowminded and ignorant as ure self to kiss americas @ss, no longer making enemys with everybody like yet you will possibly easily be nowhere devoid of the british, i recommend what language did you purely type that cr@ppy question in??? ah no remember the place you circulate there'll constantly be one tosser who thinks he's greater ideal than surely everyone else, so pathetic, ah properly won't be able to be helped i assume sum human beings are purely born with one million braincell (very plenty lyk ureself, or is it much less? please ultimate me if i'm incorrect lol yet i'm specific it reaches the minus's) its referred to as tremendous britain beacause there i purely reported it its tremendous, the concern ure forgetting is that if the united kingdom grew to become into as massive or larger than u . s . a . of america then u may be royaly fuked, i dont want to direct hate in direction of u . s . a . of america yet its human beings like u who initiate all the subject concerns and the incorrect message gets in the time of whilst human beings are attempting to describe issues or maybe it out. and britain have low self-well worth, what's u . s . a . of america properly wide-unfold for back. forgotten? i will remind you - whats up fatty bum bum want yet another cream cake?!?! (back no offence to the regarded after individuals who want no hardship yet u gotta capture my decide for the flow) you quite do ignore what superb issues come from britain, i recommend many of the bands we've are legend, between the main suitable places for music (purely to instruct it genuine, what related to the beatles and iron maiden i believe the beatles have been voted the main suitable music group EVER) there is plenty greater i might want to declare yet ure purely gonna examine this and think of huh limey n0b (limey is a gd concern we survived scurvy haha) and shove your head decrease back up your @rse, oh and *** u in strengthen for something u say i could no longer care much less, i additionally found out an exciting concern related to the international-huge-information superhighway you oughta comprehend, if britain rather sucks then how ought to we of created the information superhighway? --->look at my components, i'm specific you would be pleasently suprised so yeh all in all you have lost n00b, p.s u gotta look at sikipedia it is going to likely be a suitable punch interior the face if u dnt thn it proves ure frightened of the certainty lol...
2016-12-17 16:39:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by bumbray 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Like the article said it is a dog eat dog world. and like it or not people are sick. and our governments are pathetic. Neighborhoods do not support each other. like in the old days.
2007-02-14 16:41:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because they didn't give the children enough welfare.
Duh.
2007-02-14 16:31:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bec 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
spend little on children even though rich
2007-02-14 16:30:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋