At least Hitler had a plan and didn't stumble over his words.
2007-02-14 15:52:47 · 36 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
My dear you hit the nerve. Not only do i not like him but he has a very decieveing face. I don,t trust the man. Much too stiff for me. He looks so out of place when he is shown at the Kenendy arts center.He sit there like he has better things to do. Definitely not a theater type neither is that stiff wife of his they remind me of the house of wax in motion. He is an embarrasment to American Culture. I just can,t look at him ever since i picked up on his phoney look. But that is just what i see.
2007-02-14 16:11:16 · answer #1 · answered by becca 2 · 2⤊ 7⤋
I'd say that you need to brush up on your history a bit if you really believe that. Bush stumbles but Hitler was insane. If Hitler had our military strength the entire middle east and most of the rest of the world would be destroyed. I'm not a big fan of Bush but he's not even close to Hitler. True that Hitler had a plan but his methods of carrying out that plan were barbaric. We are in a war and lots of people, myself included, don't agree with why we are there but just think for a minute what we could do if we wanted. We could pretty much level Iraq. We could easily and completely destroy any village, town or city where we met opposition and leave no one alive without losing a single American soldier if that's what we chose to do.
We are fighting this war the hard way. We are trying not to kill innocent people. We're trying to be humane. We are providing medical care and food to them. Trying to show compassion and trying to rebuild as the fighting is still going on. Ever hear of Hitler doing that? Ever hear of ANY other invading army doing that?
I hope this gives you something to think about.
2007-02-14 16:28:01 · answer #2 · answered by Tom G 2 · 5⤊ 1⤋
I think you are arrogent, and ill-educated. So you think that just because Hitler had a plan, and didn't stumble over his words that he is BETTER than George Bush? I think you need to do a little research. As far as I know, President Bush isn't planning to march all radical Isamics into an incinerator, or gas chamber. Furthermore, Hitler wanted to rule the world. Last I checked Bush wasn't trying to rule the world... muchless Iraq.
2007-02-14 16:07:57 · answer #3 · answered by Ammie 3 · 5⤊ 3⤋
As bad is Bush is, he is nowhere near as evil as Hitler. Hitler had 6 million jews exterminated 12 or so million Germans died, as many as 33 million Russians and Poles died, 5 million English, 1 million Italians, 550,000 Americans The effects of Hitlers holocost are still being felt today because due to his extermination of the jews the few remaining jews in europe were given Isreal at the end of WW2, which remains the root cause of all the middle eastern strife today. And you think Bush is worse?
2007-02-14 16:01:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
You are an ignorant donkey of a fool who knows nothing about history or life. You can't think for yourself[ instead you swallow political propaganda without thinking and then regurgitate it. You parents should be ashamed that they allowed you to grow up with so little education and no ability to discern the difference between true evil and dyslexia. In fact, you typify the people who allowed Hitler to reach the power he did; you are the paragon of those who accepted the garbage spewed by Goering to hypnotize the stupid and uneducated.
Grow up and start to think for yourself. Start by turning off CNN and don't read DU anymore.
2007-02-14 16:44:42 · answer #5 · answered by mourning my dad 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
So, in other words, you are telling us that you would rather live in Nazi Germany than America in 2007.
Do you think that Hitler was morally superior to Bush because he wanted to wipe-out all of the world's non-Northwestern Europeans?
2007-02-14 17:09:02 · answer #6 · answered by Jesus Jones 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I personally admire Hitler. He is the only man that I can recall that was able to pull the proverbial wool over the world's 'eyes', and do exactly what he wanted to do.
It was wrong to kill the Jews, and I disagree with their murder...but what person hasn't wanted to kill at least one person during the course of their life?
Bush isn't as talented as Hitler was. Or is he? Only time will tell. We really have no idea what he is doing, what is 'plan is', and what will come of it.
2007-02-14 16:17:34 · answer #7 · answered by Nuke Everyone Equally 1 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I am sorry, but if you think Bush is worse than Hitler than you obviously need to go back to school. If that doesn't help, than it is clear that our educational system in the United States is failing our children.
2007-02-14 17:02:52 · answer #8 · answered by asmith1022_2006 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I think you have lived a very sheltered and privileged life in a country where you can talk as much smack as you want about our leader and no one drags you off to die for it.
I would also like to see the Concentration Camps. You can't use Gitmo - people are GAINING weight there. I'm waiting for some liberal to sue for "forced obesity" or some equally moronic BS.
Did Hitler provide the Jews with their religious texts? Did he meet their religious dietary needs? Gee, why did all those people starve in Concentration Camps?
You need to take a history class and learn about the Holocaust. For you to compare Bush to Hitler is a slap in the face to anyone who lost family to the Nazis.
At least I'm back to disagreeing with you - I seriously thought the world was coming to the end for a few there. *whew*
2007-02-14 15:58:09 · answer #9 · answered by Jadis 6 · 5⤊ 4⤋
NO WAY man! Bush may have unneccesarily sent thousands of brave people to their deaths, but Hitler was just wack. Killed Millions of people because they weren't blonde(arien race).
2007-02-14 15:56:21 · answer #10 · answered by ? 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No, I'm not worse than Hitler. Why do you ask? Are you worse than Hitler? Oh well. God Bless you.
2007-02-14 15:55:48 · answer #11 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋