2007-02-14 15:30:03 · 21 answers · asked by charlie 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think that if everyone only had one child, or two, or zero, then the population would take care of itself. And that "be fruitful and multiply thing, only applies during times when our species has been severely depleted and needs to be replenished!!!!!
2007-02-14 21:26:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A hunt might in basic terms seize a vulnerable or previous fox. via fact the seek ban, land vendors, get to shoot healthful foxes. you will possibly think of a bullet might kill a fox outright, regrettably the fox in many cases dies a sluggish and painful dying. I stay interior the country and characteristic considered shot foxes take 3 days to die from gunshot wounds. The cry they make whilst in soreness is indescribable. yet, all reported and executed, the shot foxes are the fortunate ones. via fact the seek ban which became a physically powerful thank you to kill sick/vulnerable/previous foxes, diesese between foxes has greater suitable and dying is even slower. It would desire to be severe-high quality to stay in a city and to no longer would desire to work out any of this, you don't be conscious of how fortunate you're or how lots injury you're doing.
2016-12-17 10:20:47 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is this one of those weirdo over-population crazes?
I don't mean to get all political in the politics section, but didn't Liberals start that? The same people who want to continue stem cell research to save people from death? And the ones protecting the multiply-like-rabbits illegals?
Something isn't making sense here...
2007-02-14 15:39:34 · answer #3 · answered by Picard Facepalm 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Al Gore
Bill Clinton
Jessie Jackson
Ted Kennedy
Al Sharpton
Hillary RodHum Clinton
Many Many More Enough said!
2007-02-14 15:33:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
If you are like most scientists you would always say yes If people say yes you take away a personal rightto reproduce & you would also force women to have abortions Not an option for catholics & others. How do you find these people go into their homes & work Answer NO
2007-02-14 15:41:17 · answer #5 · answered by hobo 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Democrat for President, they like to abort babies. Elect a lesbian, they will adopt all the one's not aborted, but want actually give birth to one themself, then those family values will keep going on and on and on. This should slow down population the Liberal way.
2007-02-14 15:48:54 · answer #6 · answered by m c 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Holy crap - somebody, quick!! Is the earth still turning?
I actually agree with Chucky and Lucky....
And I haven't even been drinking!
Humane beings should exercise some responsibility.
2007-02-14 15:48:40 · answer #7 · answered by Jadis 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
To control human population, make George W(anker) Bush life president and name his Deputy, Tony Butt (licker) Blair and we will fast control and reduction of population.
2007-02-14 15:38:15 · answer #8 · answered by ashok kumar 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
the law can control the population, if each country would have a law contolling population growth (for example: a woman can only have 2 children..)
2007-02-14 15:40:00 · answer #9 · answered by joanneski 1 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Birth control would do it humanely but war seems to be more popular right now.
2007-02-14 15:34:17 · answer #10 · answered by Rich Z 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋