After all, he did lie about the WMD. We've heard for years that he wants to invade Iran. And as of now, his top generals say that there is no proof that the leaders of Iraq of supplying the insurgents. Will Americans buy his new report?
2007-02-14 15:22:29 · 25 answers · asked by Rosebee 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Poo poop dee doo........
He's sort of like "The Boy That Cried Wolf". If he did have good information, nobody would believe him now. That's what happens when you lie too much.
*kiss*
2007-02-14 15:30:02 · answer #1 · answered by Marilyn 2 · 5⤊ 4⤋
No as he has a history of lying so we can not believe him at all. Its just Bush now wants Iran's oil and wants a reason to attack it so its just beating the same drum it did for Iraq's WMD.
2007-02-14 17:14:41 · answer #2 · answered by Mastang 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not a chance. After all the lies and deliberate manipulation of the American people to not go after Osama bin Laden and end up in Baghdad instead, they have lost all credibility. At this point, if an actual meteor was headed towards Earth, and Bush warned us about it, 80% of those polled across the planet would not believe him.
But he will bomb Iran anyway, as this was the same pattern they used prior to attacking Iraq. "fool me once shame on ... fool me twice and you are a member of Skull & Bones."
2007-02-14 16:04:20 · answer #3 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
1: He did not lie about there being WMD in Iraq. At least one vehicle designed to develop chemical weapons was found. Like roaches .. where there's one ...
2: He did not lie about Saddam having terrorist ties. Saddam openly and proudly paid the family of homicide bombers for their sacrifice. How much more proof of support for terrorist does anybody need?
Now, about Iran:
1: WMD? Check out Google Earth 33-43'26.6N 51-43'33.7 E, and 32-34'55.3N 51-49'31.5 E. Can't get more WMD than nukes.
2: Support for terrorist? Ask the 52 hostages that were held for 444 days. Also, many terrorists fled to Iran from Afghanistan.
There's nothing for the American people to "buy." Do your own research on the net. It's all there.
Side notes:
Russia is quietly rebuilding their military using funds from oil sales - another reason to develop our own energy source. After the 1st gulf war, Russia was extremely angry at the performance of the Russian equipment Iraq used. With the close ties between Russia and Iran, it wouldn't surprise me to find out that Russia is designing weapons, having Iran build them, and testing them against US equipment in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Also note, Korea is starting to play nice. Why? Big brother China is enjoying having the US as a huge customer. Who is China going to side with in a Korea/US war? Don't bite the hand that feeds you - at least not until you find another hand.
2007-02-14 17:26:57 · answer #4 · answered by scavenger_meat 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
properly possibly he have a secret agent interior Iran and tell on the subject of the tecnology of there...... And after whilst had deliver the army to conflict in Iraq had found the comparable tecnology in the Iraq´s squaddies. On those countries countless those that desire money so, is amazingly basic for Bush pay for innovations, that´s a thrue.
2016-09-29 03:29:02 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, and I don't think Bush is the only one who is saying that Iran is supplying Iraq insurgents.
2007-02-14 15:32:57 · answer #6 · answered by Max 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The intelligence that was used by this administration had been gathered for many years prior to Bush even being elected. It isn't like POTUS can just make things up especially that he isn't the one gathering the intelligence. The weapons that they are talking about have actually been seen by our military and experts.
And how do you like this?
Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to completely deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.
We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Former Clinton Vice-President
Speech to San Francisco Commonwealth Club
September 23, 2002
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2002-09-23-gore-text_x.htm
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,797999,00.html
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/09/24/1032734161501.html
2007-02-14 15:35:58 · answer #7 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Oh brother, so you're another one that's going to doubt everything he says now, eh?
Careful, if you lean anymore to the left you might fall over.
You've seen the proof for yourself that Iran has sent weapons used to kill U.S. troops in Iraq...what more do you need...more American troops killed by Iranian supplied weaponry?
How much longer do you think Bush is going to tolerate this without taking some kind of action?
Do we just sit back and allow ourselves to be pushed around?
And oh, by the way...Bush didn't "lie" about WMD in Iraq...he was relying on incorrect information and intelligence (that began with the Clinton administration I might add) that he now regrets...he's already admitted that.
2007-02-14 15:32:07 · answer #8 · answered by GeneL 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋
you have to stupid to think iran is not doing some thing in iraq.
the WMDs on the other hand...well bush is a dick head.
2007-02-14 15:45:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Bush clearly has his own agenda, but this should not lead us to think that this is a lie. We should take this possibility into consideration independent of what Bush says or has said in the past.
2007-02-14 15:31:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
You sure don`t hear him talk about how the Saudi Arabia citizens that are having fund raisers to send money to Iraq insurgents.
2007-02-14 15:27:41 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 2⤋