that the only reason feminism has been thought of set up and funded was to limit the output of babies per woman ?
2007-02-14 14:28:04 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Gender Studies
It was one of the Rockefellers who said how much better the world would be if we would be 1 billion instead of 6 billion and growing on it and look who poured wagons of money into feminism. The Rockefeller foundation of all people. Makes you think.
2007-02-14 14:44:02 · update #1
Why should I ? Iam not on trial here. You are free to not believe what anyone posts and nobody has to provide evidence.
Get a life looser.
2007-02-14 15:56:03 · update #2
You dont tell people in the land of the free to have less babies. You make them want, what you want them to want. Besides in each and every country feminism is in effect, birth rates dropped below reproduction rates. When was the last time that happend ?
2007-02-15 00:30:34 · update #3
Yes: not just ANYONE could come up with that (conspiracy) theory. Feeling a little paranoid today, are we?
EDIT:
If I've said it once I've said it a thousand times "SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE".
EDIT:
"nobody has to provide evidence" IN ORDER FOR THEIR CLAIMS TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY, GRASSHOPPA, YES THEY DO NEED TO PROVIDE EVIDENCE. THIS IS A MAJOR REASON YOU AND YOUR CO-HORTS ARE NOT TAKEN SERIOUSLY:
IT'S CALLED 'CREDIBILITY": WITHOUT IT YOU ARE MERELY A CRANK.
2007-02-14 14:38:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Perhaps the abortion part of feminism was, but as for the anti-male/anti-family aspect, I'm not so sure. First of all, it's increased women's promiscuity imo, so there is a larger body of women having irresponsible sex around. Second of all couldn't they have just imposed a quota like in China, or done something less cruel that wouldn't stuff society up.
Additionally, lowering the population will have negative effects on an aging population when there is not enough income being generated to support pensions for an elderly population that outnumbers youth. Of course, the "power elite" wouldn't care about this, but the links between the "power elite" etc. and feminism are tenuous imo.
Yes, a decline in population could be easily caused by feminism though. I think conspiracy theories like this are caused by the reeling at the success of such a destructive movement, and being loath to put it down to simply western female narcissism. Still feel free to post links or flesh out the theory further, I'm not totally against it.
2007-02-15 03:01:42 · answer #2 · answered by Happy Bullet 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It never occurred to me that feminism was funded to limit how many children women had. Of course abortion was/is one of the causes feminist stand behind , but i think it is because they want women to have to have the choice to decide whether they want to have children or not. Also feminist have fought to increase wages earned by women since women are still working for much less pay than men and most are the sole support of their children and households. I've never been considered a feminist however i think as a woman I have reaped the benefits of their battles.
2007-02-14 22:42:59 · answer #3 · answered by phylobri 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Um, and limit the output of babies per woman for WHAT purpose? Because if you explain that purpose, then maybe you'd be getting at something that makes sense.
2007-02-15 00:06:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
You may not be the only one, but you and all those who agree with you are wrong.
2007-02-14 22:35:26 · answer #5 · answered by Larry 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It might be. Feminists certainly aren't attractive to most males.
2007-02-14 22:36:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
absolutely! you are the only one. special, special you are.
2007-02-14 22:36:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋