Assuming you would have the skills to do it and you would make the same amount of money either way. Why?
2007-02-14 14:18:37 · 19 answers · asked by Wendy B 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
My first impulse was to say CEO, because I have no desire to be in the spot light, however CEOs have a lot of responsibility, so I guess I'd rather be a movie star.
2007-02-14 14:24:44 · answer #1 · answered by Andrew 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's a tough one. A CEO has the glory with out all the privacy issues that a movie star would have. But a movie star has the notoriaty. I don't know, I think I value my privacy more, I'll choose CEO.
2007-02-14 22:32:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anna Hennings 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Star Movie.
2007-02-15 18:00:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Being a movie star would be cool, but being a CEO is more impactful and you really accomplish things, so I would choose to be a CEO - can I pick which company???
2007-02-15 00:59:02 · answer #4 · answered by leos1964 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Movie star
2007-02-14 22:21:54 · answer #5 · answered by Space Ace 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Movie Star. More glamorous. CEOs work a lot of hours and there's too much BS.
2007-02-14 22:20:41 · answer #6 · answered by Kiss My Shaz 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
CEO definitely, I wouldn't in a million years want to be a movie star.I wouldn't wan't my life to be left in tatters like that, I mean, just look how messed up the lives of celebrities are. There's a divorce happening every second..
2007-02-14 22:22:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
a CEO because movie stars go through to much crap and media
2007-02-14 22:21:54 · answer #8 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
CEO I wouldnt want to be in the lime light like the celebrities are
2007-02-14 22:21:44 · answer #9 · answered by ACV 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
CEO i don't need all that attention every 2 seconds i like to have my own life
2007-02-14 22:21:13 · answer #10 · answered by mara 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋