English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why do those that believe global warming is man made believe it in spite of the fact their models are seriously flawed ?

2007-02-14 13:57:29 · 11 answers · asked by xartinu33 3 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Gee Madformac...your pretty preachy...same old same old...not one scientific fact...no proof...just a flawed model.

2007-02-14 14:23:01 · update #1

..and by the way... I didnt call the scientists flawed I called the MODEL flawed.

2007-02-14 14:24:35 · update #2

11 answers

Honeslty it's not man's fault, but we are a big contributer to it. Believe it or not cow's flatulents produce more CO2 a year then human's excess burning of green house gases. Earth has gone through sevral phases of climate changes throughout its life.

I believe global warming is happening and we should take caution, but I don't think man is responsible. Think of it this way.. after the last ice age what have the glaciers been doing? Cooling off and freezing? No, they have been melting away a little each year. Or how about this. Back in the stone age when wolly mamoths and cave-men were around there was a giant ice age. There were absolutley no green house gases being burned like they were now.. so you would think the world would have stayed that way forever. But it gradually melted and then disappeared.. long before the technalogy and excess green house gas burning.

So basically no. I dont think man is responsible alone, but we are a contributer to it.

My history teacher pointed out a good point to my class the other day. He said, "global warming is happening, but the only reason it is so talked about and cautioned on today is because of the scientist's pay check." he also said, "back in the 80's the scientists had a theory that by the year 2000 we would be in a Global Freezing and we all would die. The 90's came and the scientists started to realize they weren't 100% accurate on their research.. so they said by 2010 we would be in a complete Global Warming and nothing would survive. The 2000's came and they are sticking to their story but they are saying it will happen within 100 years. So you can make your own opinion about that."

2007-02-14 14:07:32 · answer #1 · answered by jake 3 · 5 0

How can you talk about Global Warming when it's cold all over the world?

People in Cambodia are dealing with unusually cold weather: http://www.reformatorischdagblad.nl/artikel/1291196/&bdquo%3BPlease,+take+a+coat+with+you&rdquo%3B.html

A House of Representatives subcommittee on Energy and Air Policy, that was scheduled to meet Wednesday to discuss global warming, was cancelled due to inclement weather. http://www.rocktownweekly.com/opinion_details.php?AID=8764&sub=Editorial

Cold weather in the Philippines: http://www.bulatlat.com/news/7-2/7-2-photoweek.html

It's cold in San Diego too: http://www.10news.com/news/10806428/detail.html

Why didn't these models predict 12 feet on New York snow?

Once again, another left wing gripe with no alternative plan. I guess the only way to stop Global Warming would be for man to revert back to hunting and gathering.

2007-02-14 17:22:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Well, if you call opinions of most of the brightest scientific minds in the world "flawed" I certainly would like to know where you are getting your information.

You probably did not hear the news released last week by scientists in the US who said they were told to be quiet with their information by the Bush administration. No surprise there, right?

You need to educate yourself regarding what global warming is, it has been around for a while now. It is thought that it began with industrialization approximately 100 years ago. We have polluted our world, where have you been? Haven't you been aware of the fact that every single water way in the world is polluted? That air everywhere has a certain amount of pollution?

Where do you think all of the crud from cars, industry and agriculture goes? It does not disappear, it stays in our atmosphere, in our soil and in our water. This was bound to happen given how the world has been living the past 100 years.

2007-02-14 14:09:10 · answer #3 · answered by MadforMAC 7 · 1 4

There under no circumstances become any valid conflict of words on the motives of international Warming to any extent further than there become ever conflict of words that cigarette smoking brought about Lung maximum cancers. there have been paid "hacks" in the medical community that tried to cutting-edge fake info, the two in relation to Tobacco and now with human precipitated international Warming (study Exxon and cellular oil companies). The uneducated human beings denying international Warming are "flat-Earth'ers " and can settle for as lots credence as people who think of the sunlight revolves around the Earth. the quantity of Carbon Dioxide that has been further to the ambience in the final a hundred and fifty years is a nil.33 bigger than it has ever been in the final 650,000 years. The measurements are recorded from ice samples from Antarctica. In 50 years, CO2 tiers are projected to be +fifty 5% bigger than they have ever been ever. that's if we do no longer something and proceed to do the eat-drink-and-be-merry coverage we are doing now. The extreme CO2 selection was ~270 ppm of CO2. it incredibly is now approximately 350 ppm. it incredibly is projected to bypass in the direction of six hundred ppm. comprehend additionally that for the duration of the final ice age (whilst CO2 become around a hundred and fifty ppm) the area of the place Chicago is now, become under one mile of ice! we are treading completely new floor with what we are doing with the ambience. comprehend additionally that if the two the Greenland or Antarctic ice cabinets soften, approximately 20% of Florida would be under water. This includes all of Miami-Dade county and the Tampa-St. Pete areas. do no longer forget approximately different coastal areas, consisting of New Orleans and ny city. hundreds of thousands of folk would be displaced in this u . s . a . on my own.

2016-09-29 03:25:27 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

People that question Christianity, challenge christians to prove there is a god and/or Jesus. Christians can not prove this to the disbelievers ANYMORE THAN THE DISBELIEVERS CAN DISPROVE THE EXISTENCE OF GOD OR JESUS. By the same token no one can prove if man is or is not responsible for global warming.

2007-02-14 14:24:16 · answer #5 · answered by just the facts 5 · 1 1

Humans have pillaaged earth's natural resources for centuries, but since the industrial age and the rise of the automobile, it has damaged our ecology exponentially. If we don't do something about it, each of us, our planet could become uninhabitable in the next century. What a legacy to leave our descendants. If each of us do a small part to reverse the damaage, they maay have a planet to call theirs. As for the cattle's emissions of CO2, Who raises the cattle, and for whose consumption?

2007-02-14 14:25:59 · answer #6 · answered by debop44 3 · 0 2

I think liberalism has become a of religion and it is incredible how passionately these idiots believe in the tenets of their faith.

2007-02-14 14:23:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

What do u mean? If it weren't for man there wouldn't be global warming!

2007-02-14 14:08:39 · answer #8 · answered by bstaer 1 · 0 3

thank you for these wonderful 2 points.

2007-02-14 16:53:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Media.
sheep
Baaaaa.

Same ol same ol .

2007-02-14 14:03:56 · answer #10 · answered by Matt 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers