English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Didnt you libs see the headllines, that our troops are in Bagdad searching for terrorists, and they havent met any resistance?

This shows that they want America to liberate them, and that Bush was right.

I demand that you libs admit it, that Bush was right, and that we are safer since the war, no attacks since 911!

2007-02-14 13:49:58 · 15 answers · asked by altoonapostingclub 1 in Politics & Government Politics

15 answers

lol....funny stuff..have another drink of kool aid.

2007-02-14 13:56:38 · answer #1 · answered by itsdabigbadwolf 3 · 1 1

Let me first say that I'm an Independent and want to give you my view exactly the way I see it! Here goes: Its very sad that we are not seeing the truth of what is really taking place in Iraq! The media seems to only want to show the negative and never have anything positive to say. I blame alot of the Bush bashing on the media for falsely misleading people on the war in Iraq! The media coverage should show the entire picture and it doesn't! News should be just like I like my food: Real and Organic! If you can't tell the truth, you should find a different trade!

2007-02-14 14:07:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

you won't be able to applaud the tax cuts and then whine about the tremendous quantity of deficit spending, it truly is mandatory to make up for the sales shortfall and to make amends for the tremendous shift in wealth that has led to a wide imbalance in the availability/deficit stability that is major for a healthful and growing to be economy. Liberals are not claiming that the economy is "tremendous" now, purely that it truly is way, a lot more beneficial efficient than it become lower than Bush. i do not recognize how you could declare that liberals did not say some thing even as Obama agreed to amplify them even as the conservatives were conserving our u . s .'s credit hostage. it truly is purely no longer real.

2016-11-28 03:41:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Dude, you are ****** up! I am not a liberal, just so you know over 3000 service men and women are dead. We have bank of america giving away credit cards, checking accounts, and loans to illegal immigrants without identification and a social security card. George has an open tab and it will take over 100 years to pay off. This war from the beginning was rushed into and wasn't thought out. I am also tired of people criticizing liberals. I don't think the republicans or democrats have did anything that special either. They can agree over what to get for lunch much less important things to run our country. George has divided this country more than reuniting it. Watch the news, do some reading.

2007-02-14 13:57:22 · answer #4 · answered by Kiah G 2 · 3 2

Were there any terrorists in Iraq until the US invaded? if there were any, the threat was minimal from within Iraq. So the invasion was a waste of time even before you begin your arguement. Bin Laden and his cronies, for example, were all elsewhere. Why wasnt Bush chasing Bin Laden? Maybe because he is a Saudi and Bush has strong connections with many of the influential families in Saudi Arabia?

2007-02-14 13:59:13 · answer #5 · answered by Zag 4 · 2 1

Someone is lying. The joint chiefs told the Senate that the Surge will not be ready until September.

Some did make an advance move for the photo opp. But the men and their new equipment will not be ready to roll for months.

Go big Red Go

2007-02-14 14:22:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

LMAO! I know a lib will report this for not being an answer, but...

I think you should get 10 points for best question! That popping noise you hear is the sound of liberal heads exploding at the very thought.....

You made my night!

2007-02-14 13:57:05 · answer #7 · answered by Jadis 6 · 1 2

just because there haven't been any attacks since 9/11 doesn't mean we're safer. and, oh yeah, 9/11 had nothing to do with iraq... remember al quaida? and how we went to look for bin laden in afghanistan? yeah.

2007-02-14 14:08:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Yes Al Sadr is now on the run. Seems the more progress that is made against terrorism the more the Dems foam at the mouth.

2007-02-14 13:54:05 · answer #9 · answered by Ibredd 7 · 1 2

I'm not a liberal.Bush's "plan" is failing.The march of time shall prove me to be correct.

2007-02-14 13:55:43 · answer #10 · answered by anne green-gabell 1 · 1 0

Stubborn ignorance and a willful disregard for facts

2007-02-14 13:52:36 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

fedest.com, questions and answers