http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11%2C_2001_attacks
There ya go...it's a heck of a lot to read and kind of hard to comprehend but it's explains everything.
2007-02-14 13:53:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by ღღღ 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Is u . s . a . safer today because 9/11? regrettably, an elementary definite or no answer oversimplifies a complicated challenge. for this reason, a conditional “definite” is the more desirable suitable reaction. even as confronting and enticing terrorism around the globe might want to enhance the opportunity of the u . s . a . falling sufferer to a distinct attack in the close to-time period, that's an important danger to make sure the lengthy-time period safe practices of the country. it really is likewise real, although, that no terrorists have effectively achieved a important attack on American soil because 9/11. for sure, that does no longer advise an attack received't take position day after today, even though it really is indicative of the shape that the country has made in the course of the last 2-years. the U. S. has in actuality instituted a coverage of protection at homestead and offense in another usa. u . s . a .’s activities can more desirable or less be positioned in 2 categories: the war on terrorism and native land safe practices initiatives. In each and every classification, america has taken concrete steps which will make the country safer in the longer time period if the yank authorities and public proceed to be dedicated to the enormous job accessible.
2016-11-03 11:55:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
We hav eto go with what we know, and we know what we saw....We saw planes flying into buildings....killing thousands of innocent men women and children. If you go back and look at pres. bush face when he was told....he was not a very happy man...he had to keep his composure. If bin laden was paid off then it was by anotehr arab country. When construction on teh WTC began, and the designs were laid out....they all knew then that the buildings would not be able to take a direct hit from a plane, and they knew that it woudl collapse, because all the support was in teh middle with very little on the outside. The reason I know this is because my husband is a Fireman, and they had to study the structure of the WTC. The Empire state bldg. is designed to take a direct hit, i just cannot remember the size of the plane....they know this because a plane has crashed into it before.I have heard all kinds of conspiracy theories......and a theory is a what.....a guess! There are no facts to back up a theory.....The facts are what we saw, the fact is that bin laden did not deny he did it...he did it b4, and they sould have known he was coming back. Those who believe in the conspiracy have no thinking mind of their own, htey let everyone else do it for them, they are lost, and do not believe in facts......I mean if you told them to stop walking because they were getting ready to walk into a brick wall.....they would not stop, the fact is the wall is there.....the fact is they are going to walk into it and break their nose.....but these ppl do not believe in facts, and never will.
2007-02-14 14:07:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by mrs_endless 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's not "everyone" who blames Bush for 9/11, only the completely confused and uninformed. The conspiracy nuts represent about 10% of the population, but they are a very loud minority. It's not too hard to figure out. We know who flew those planes and Bin Laden said he organized it. You can hear all sorts of outrageous conspiracy theories, but none hold water.
The real truth is a bunch of Islamofascists flew planes into the World Trade Center buildings.
2007-02-14 13:53:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Al-Qaida took credit for it. I think it is theirs to take. Did you see all the street celebrations over it in the middle east? Our government?.....Not a chance...Too big a chance of a leak & swift, terrible revenge. Nope, it wasn't the American government who did that act of terrorism.
2007-02-14 13:56:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by mazell41 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
know one knows there is no hard truth just alot of talk.It should be investigated but I still can`t see eal hard evidence;the only good one is the insurance policy taken out for the towers;but the owner knew that back in the 90`s that the towers bombed beforehand so what good is that evidence?????
2007-02-14 13:51:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It's insane all the way around and thousands of people died needlessly that day. Whoever is guilty must be brought to justice to quote our president.
2007-02-14 13:49:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by cadaholic 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. All that stuff about the government doing it is BIASED .
2007-02-14 13:50:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Odd that it's on the back of our money.
2007-02-14 13:52:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by elliebear 7
·
0⤊
1⤋