apparently don mclean felt this way..and i tend to agree with him
i think especially since his song is used for a credit card company its further confirmed
2007-02-14 13:34:27 · 18 answers · asked by Frank 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
jagger is satans twin
2007-02-14 13:56:38 · answer #1 · answered by TOM 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Mick Jagger Agent
2016-12-13 04:04:47 · answer #2 · answered by bise 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He said himself that he felt like he was a bishop of Satan's army. Read his own words. His latest girlfriend killed herself during a Satanic ritual. Keith said we sold our souls for Rock and roll. Maybe they were kidding? Goats head soup, sympathy for the devil, Her majesty satanic bulshit album....yeah, those are coincidences?
2014-05-17 15:25:30 · answer #3 · answered by DOELLE 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Stones were awesome, I had each and every album in the previous their "re-invention". i won't be able to pick a proper one because each and every defines the on the spot. From "Little purple chicken" to "highway battling guy" to "Her Satanic Majesty's Request" to "Brown Sugar" sheer genius. Mick himself should be congratulated on defining a operating type ethos on middle type origins. He talked about track for what it really is, a fashion to attain superstar, funds and status, inspite of having all 3 to commence with. yet the following he's at sixty 5, nevertheless planning the subsequent excursion. What we "originals" loved about him replaced into the organic p**s take he took, and he continues to be taking it lol. choosing a favourite Stones record denigrates the impact they took from the Blues and different black genres, and made their "personal". Mick, having the intelligence that he does, only talked about a gap in the marketplace and exploited it.. skill to him, yet i particularly haven't any favor to work out a guy of his age get carry of in yet more desirable funds needlessly, it smacks of massive ego, and a "Dorian gray" fixation. Retire Mick, it isn't eye-catching, enable us followers experience what the band replaced into, no longer what it has develop into, a nostalgia vacation should you were no longer there even as it occurred.
2016-11-03 11:53:48 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Mick is a poor, pathetic, tired old man who, contrary to his words in the sixties, is indeed posturing and singing "Satisfaction" at the age of 60.
Agent of Satan? He'd need to have some influence to be that.
2007-02-14 13:37:23 · answer #5 · answered by j3nny3lf 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think Keith Richards is an agent of satan, he looks like him and should have been dead 10 times over already.
2007-02-14 13:39:06 · answer #6 · answered by likris 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He is arrogant, but probably not an agent of satan. Evil? Maybe a bit.
2007-02-14 13:42:03 · answer #7 · answered by Tikimaskedman 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
thats impossible, I will have you know missy that i am still in the employ of satan as his agent. And I wont have you spreading this kind of slanderous filth!!!!!!!
2007-02-14 14:08:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hell no,,lol.
I think that you are misinterpreting the meaning to some of their songs.I honestly believe that they are just the opposite.
I love the Stones,,they are my favorite.They are living legends,,let 'em Rock. ;O)
2007-02-14 14:03:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no...don mclean was singing about buddy holly silly
2007-02-14 13:37:41 · answer #10 · answered by cpinkfloyd 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋