After all, no matter who the majority wants as their leader, it just takes ONE US Supreme Court Justice to overrule the will of the people. What do you think?
2007-02-14 13:33:48 · 6 answers · asked by Tom B 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think you don't understand what really happened in 2000, or you're deliberately misstating the facts, but in either event you're too close-minded to have it explained to you.
2007-02-14 13:38:35 · answer #1 · answered by dukefenton 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think that is a very good question...
The answer is voting is not a waste of time. Yes we were shafted by a party-line Supreme Court vote to determine our presidency; but, we just have to make certain to all vote more now in order for the votes to not be so close.
2007-02-15 23:20:22 · answer #2 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A flawed system is no reason to hand over one of the most important rights that America enjoys. Unless you are willing to accept the Supreme Court's decision for every election....
2007-02-16 14:05:50 · answer #3 · answered by Super Ruper 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yep...this electorial Diebold Voting system is for the birds. We needto go back to paper ballots and counting them by hand. So what if it's a little extra work. At least it will keep things honest.
2007-02-14 21:43:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well researching the topic is always crucial prior to discussing a matter.
2007-02-14 21:54:53 · answer #5 · answered by Mike J 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes its a waste of time, so please, no Democrats vote in 2008.
2007-02-17 15:24:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋