2007-02-14 13:21:54 · 17 answers · asked by Susan S 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I don't think either one of them have a snowballs chance in hell, why do people continue to promote these people who do not have the best interest of the American people in mind.
It is very sad. Do you not feel that illegal immigration needs to be stopped? Everyone of the so called front runners have no intention of doing what's correct according to our LAWS.
These people don't care about me or you they only care about the power.
2007-02-14 13:56:34 · answer #1 · answered by jason s 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
When the heat is on snow balls turn to water and then evaporate. That is what will happen to H.C.'s chances. If She doesn't make a good showing Her credibility will be shot down in flames. If She makes a go of it but is beaten then She will have shot Herself in the foot for any future nominations, and will have to weather the recriminations from both her supporters and the public at large. If She wins then all I can say is that the weather is great in Australia!
2007-02-14 21:32:12 · answer #2 · answered by Ashleigh 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Get flippen serious. The question is, does Rudi have a snowballs chance again Hillary? NO he don't... Outside NYC, no one even knows the foo...
2007-02-14 21:30:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Certainly. Giuliani is an aplogist for the Iraqi debacle. He also has some serious personal baggage regarding his various dalliances and his spectacular divorce that could be a burden. Also, the religious right, which is the party base, won't like him very much as he is socially moderate.
2007-02-14 21:26:31 · answer #4 · answered by jhartmann21 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If the dems have any sense they won't even nominate her. She has already been all over the place about her vote on Iraq.
It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Senator Hillary Clinton (Democrat, New York)
Addressing the US Senate
October 10, 2002
http://clinton.senate.gov/speeches/iraq_101002.html
2007-02-14 21:29:42 · answer #5 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No. If Rudy had not gotten cancer and forced to quit the race for Senate she would not have won the election.People are tired of the Clinton's and wish them well in retirement.Nader will hurt her chances . The left wing wackos won't like her trying to act non liberal and will vote for a wacko that they like.
2007-02-14 21:29:52 · answer #6 · answered by Fly Boy 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You should probably be asking if Rudi stands a chance against Hillary. I don't think he does.
2007-02-14 21:27:07 · answer #7 · answered by grrluknow 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes.
However, ball-buster Hillary doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell against Condi Rice.
2007-02-14 21:26:56 · answer #8 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Rudolph may have more experience with snowballs, but Hillary has more experience.
2007-02-15 01:30:54 · answer #9 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither one of them will be the candidate of either party.
a year is a long time in politics
2007-02-14 21:25:55 · answer #10 · answered by egg_zaktly 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋