2007-02-14 12:56:15 · 10 answers · asked by Juan B 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
no mans land
2007-02-14 13:00:16 · answer #1 · answered by blurgsplurg 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the military, if this replaced into the BEF and the French Armies had the issue of that the trenches tehy outfitted were now to not very last. They suffered escpecially from the Chalky soil espicially suffering in the third conflict of Ypres or the conflict of Passchendaele. The airborne dirt and dust replaced into like thick glue, in case you acquire stuck, you've been a useless guy, also the ditch wall's collapsed in . also there replaced into the issue of lice and how they were given everywhere, and also you may want to no longer eliminate them. Rats were a small situation. In places the position the French were and the British dug trenches it replaced into many times that the French buried their useless infantrymen in the wall the position they were, even as the Brits many times carted them off to in the back of the trenches for a shallow Burial. Water an infection did not ensue many times, the in elementary words time in WW1 the position water replaced right into a situation replaced into on the conflict of Galliopi in Turkey, the position the Water elements were contaminated. Transporaation of water replaced into in metallic barrels that were rolld down the ditch, then it replaced into filled right into a tremendous butt that held each and every of the water. nutrition replaced into no longer that a lot of a situation opposite to faux perception the soldier in the trenches recieved an uncomplicated of around4,000 energy in step with day. ailments ranged from the uncomplicated chilly to Pneumonia.
2016-11-03 11:45:47 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No Mans' Land
2007-02-14 12:58:19 · answer #3 · answered by ckm1956 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The area was called "No Man's Land".
2007-02-14 15:04:09 · answer #4 · answered by Ariel 128 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
called no man's land
2007-02-14 13:05:22 · answer #5 · answered by cajunrescuemedic 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no mans land
2007-02-14 13:02:13 · answer #6 · answered by Ben L 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That would be "no person's land" in the polite terminology of today.
2007-02-14 13:48:08 · answer #7 · answered by James@hbpl 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it was known as,no mans' land
2007-02-14 13:02:24 · answer #8 · answered by TOM 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no man's land
2007-02-18 11:16:54 · answer #9 · answered by wildirishrose19522000 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no mans land, in part cuz no one dared to venture theer and if you did you were most likely going to get shot and killed, so "no man" could live there
2007-02-14 13:04:39 · answer #10 · answered by cav 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋