tell me why u think one is better than the other.
2007-02-14 12:33:50 · 3 answers · asked by joemcf09 3 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ Other - Football
Freddy Adu, because he actually made it to Team USA and he had a contract in pro soccer at age 15.. and he didn't even hit puberty 100% yet.
2007-02-14 12:38:10 · answer #1 · answered by jkc3953 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Adu hasn't really had a chance to prove himself. He plays in the MLS. It isn't near the quality of the Premiership, Bundesliga, or even the Championship.
Walcott hasn't exactly progress that greatly since he has come over from Arsenal. I am beginning to think that maybe he left Southampton a little early, maybe not.
I saw Sahin a tournament (can't remember which), U17s or 18s.
He has so much potential, and a lot of ability. I saw more out of him then I have yet seen out of Walcott or Adu. A playmaker, seems a tough kid. If he grows, develops some size, I can see him as an option for United, maybe to replace Scholes.
Out of that list, I would say that Sahin is the best player, and has progressed the most.
2007-02-14 21:23:01 · answer #2 · answered by Wittmann 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i would say theo walcott as he's a good talented footballer and same with freddy adu, i think they both the same i dont no who nuri sahin is so i cant rate the lad
2007-02-14 21:12:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋