i dont
2007-02-14 12:23:57 · 7 answers · asked by hilleyexpress 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
I'll bet clones would age faster and die sooner.
No scientist should play god with that stuff.
Yet it's being done anyway, I'm sure.
It's irresistible to a scientist to tinker with DNA.
I say no to the idea.
2007-02-14 12:41:51 · answer #1 · answered by donnerdinnerparty 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Agree with cloning of what?
Cloning is a technique. There is nothing wrong with it.
It has been applied in the past for many beneficial purposes.
For example, once upon a time insulin was extracted from animal livers which made it very expensive but also limited compared to the number of people who needed it.
The gene was cloned in bacteria and thus scientists managed to produce large amounts of easily purified insulin making it more accessible in terms of quantity and cost.
People are talking against cloning without even knowing what they are talking about.
If you mean cloning humans then yes, I am against it. It is pointless in such a case and I can't see anything other than drawbacks.
Genetic engineering, on the other hand, should in time be used to fight genetic diseases.
2007-02-15 12:14:59 · answer #2 · answered by bellerophon 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not cloning but stem cell research yes. you can come up with cures to many diseases that people suffer from
2007-02-14 20:31:19 · answer #3 · answered by sambucca 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't agree.I think it's really bad and sinful....almost like trying to go against nature and God!
2007-02-14 20:32:55 · answer #4 · answered by Oreo 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not at all
2007-02-14 20:31:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
my neighbor does
2007-02-14 20:31:09 · answer #6 · answered by tlex 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
me neither.
2007-02-14 20:28:48 · answer #7 · answered by honey 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋