English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

From what I've seen, people think that you should marry not for love, but to reproduce. Wow, that sucks for then who don't believe in love.

Also, from what I've seen so far, people say it "sickens" them to think about it. THEN DON'T. You don't have to interact with gay people if you don't want to. I understand there are hateful people out there, but c'mon, have respect for your fellow human! That is just hateful, people who think that are hateful.

Thirdly, people say it is not "natural". Neither is a lot of things, but technologically has made it possible. And how can you say it is not natural if it is what people feel? Emotions (of all kind) are natural.

2007-02-14 11:34:13 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

By the way i am straight and christian.
but i believe in free will
especially in america
cause thats what we are all about right?

2007-02-14 11:37:47 · update #1

to be honest i dont give a crap about polygamy, get over it! that also deals with a religion, learn to have tolerance for people with different lifestyle choices then you!

2007-02-14 11:41:18 · update #2

8 answers

i TOTALLY agree with you!!

if two people are in love they should be able to get married! anyone who thinks differently should pull their heads out their asses! it's NONE of your business!

2007-02-14 14:15:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I agree that we should all have and respect free will. Pretty sure that is even in the Bible....

As far as your question about marriage being about reproduction, maybe that was true once upon a time back in the neanderthal days but it is not true today. Today we have a civilized, advanced society that is suppose to respect the rights of all ppl within the confinements of the law.

It is illegal to have more than one spous. It is illegal to have sex with children. It is illegal to commit incest, etc... It should not be illegal to marry someone of the same sex because homosexuality is not a mental disorder nor a choice.

2007-02-18 09:45:36 · answer #2 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0 0

it won't impact anybody's marriage! Jehovah God condemns unnatural intercourse acts: Marriage in accordance to the Bible is between one guy and one woman. As shown in Genesis. Adam & Eve have been married with the help of Jehovah God--it become no longer Adam and Steve! Then in the Christian Greek scriptures it mentions the be conscious "porneia" the place our be conscious pornography got here from--additionally in the Bible e book of a million Corinthians it mentions gay habit (condemning it and then) asserting " that's what a number of you have been, yet you have been washed clean..." after accepting God's information and repented and circled! a million Corinthians 5:11-13 “ yet now i'm writing you to end protecting employer with everybody called a brother who's sexually immoral or a grasping individual or an idolater or a reviler or a drunkard or an extortioner, no longer even eating with one in all those guy. For what do I could do with judging those outdoors? Do you no longer choose those interior, mutually as God judges those outdoors? “eliminate the wicked individual from between yourselves.” What may be the notice in the back of this information? To repent and turn around. undergo in strategies Sodom & Gomorra? this is likewise a reminder of ways God's wrath might properly be to unrepentant sinners!

2016-09-29 03:15:50 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I believe that the government has no right telling people who they can or cannot marry. Telling someone they can't get married because of their sex is about as ridiculous as the laws that say it is a crime to live with someone your not married to. This country was founded upon individual freedom and unalienable rights. They are not hurting anyone with their actions, and just because I desagree with them doesn't mean I have the right to stop them. Gay marriage is an individual decision, not the government's.

2007-02-14 12:21:49 · answer #4 · answered by j 4 · 0 1

Ok, as one of the people who responded to your question by saying it is not natural, I will follow up that answer with another.

I never said the erotic feelings of homosexuals was not natural, (and I am guilty of not clarifying my argument) but rather, that homosexual acts are not natural.

Homosexual acts are not natural because they do not occur naturally in human beings, but are willed to happen by homosexuals desiring pleasure.

Also, they are not natural because no good comes from such acts.

When a man and a woman participate in sexual acts out of love and not just lust, good comes from it in 2 ways: it is the highest form of expressing the couples' true love for one another, and if they are open to procreation, then a human life can result from their having sex.

This is clearly not the case for homosexuals.

2007-02-14 11:45:59 · answer #5 · answered by STILL standing 5 · 1 1

gay marriage, i don't agree with it. and its impossible to say that i can come up with an arguement apart from a religious basis.

for one, it is disgusting, and i can't stand having the idea and lifestyle flaunted in my face. it is a god given right for some people to live the way they choose, but it is not a god given right for people to live the way they do unscrutinized.

the truth of the matter is that the issue is dead in practice. conservatives will do just enough to keep the christian voter base, liberals, in effect, cannot stand to make any moves on a gay marriage bill because resolved issues don't aid in aquiring votes.

social issues are funcionally obsolete within government.

2007-02-14 13:29:03 · answer #6 · answered by alex l 5 · 0 1

Yes well some people like to ignore parts of our Constitution that they dont like.

There is nothing wrong with gay marriage and it should be allowed.
The arguments against gay marriage are bogus and just a product of their fear of homosexuals. They will rationalize their feelings on this any way possible and use any argument they can.

2007-02-14 11:41:18 · answer #7 · answered by Stephanie is awesome!! 7 · 2 1

I'm not sure I see a question there.

What about polygamy/bisexuals, etc?

Which of your arguments apply to homosexuals but not those groups?

PS People can never answer the question I posed. Nor any question about why the government should be encouraging acts which carry with them very many grave health risks.

2007-02-14 11:38:29 · answer #8 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers