We could use a lot of the same rationalizations and excuses we currently use to justify stem cell research right?
2007-02-14 10:23:26 · 10 answers · asked by John16 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
"Fetal farming" is just one step away from it.
I understand your point.
2007-02-14 10:52:59 · answer #1 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you are going to debate an issue, it would help to use facts, not emotions. Stem cell research does not equate supporting abortion.
There are millions of human children who live with life threatening diseases, and unless cures are found, they WILL die. Certain clinical trials on adults cannot be applied to children's needs, because they don't know the results (ie certain types of chemo).
If I had a child with a disorder, and a certain treatment offered a rational chance of cure, I would take that chance. That is how most cures and vaccines have been found and accepted, and you yourself benefit from those today.
My husband has multiple sclerosis, so we do know what we are talking about. If we thought a treatment MIGHT help save his life, we would take that risk, knowingly. Life has risk. If the risk showed information that would save someone from being in a wheel chair down the road, it would be even more worth it.
Fetal stem cells are absolutely NOT limited to aborted children. Millions of babies are lost in this country due to miscarriage or other normal events. Opposition to stem cell research prevents even those cells from being used.
Rational debate means sifting through emotion, and looking at facts.
2007-02-14 16:15:53 · answer #2 · answered by wendy c 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Years in the past i might want to have stated a immediately NO, although, because my daughter advanced diabetes on the age of 10 years old (insulin depending), I easily have replaced my innovations. An attempt replaced into performed in the 1920's on dogs (which isn't very outstanding i recognize), and because of this attempt they now have using insulin for diabetics, without which, they could die slowly. i'm against doing experiments on tremendous animals particularly, i dont innovations them making use of rats and mice noticeably in the adventure that they arrive across a treatment for something like alzheimers. inspite of if, on putting forward this, only because it might want to treatment a rat or mouse, would not unavoidably advise it might want to artwork on people because the body structure is different. it really is incorrect in maximum respects to apply animals for our applications, although, we does no longer have 1/2 the drugs and medicines today without this learn, so i'm about fifty 2 % agreeable to it, inspite of if it really is immoral to particular extents...
2016-11-03 11:27:39 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Extraterrestrials have been studying human children this way for many years now... what would be so crazy for humans to begin doing this ??? I say this because your question deserves an equally ridiculous answer !!!
2007-02-14 10:36:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
HELL NO! I'm 14 no way am I letting them use my niece(4) for experiments! Not in this life time.Why do that you could kill them! or hurt them mental and psychical
2007-02-14 10:31:34 · answer #5 · answered by catperry13 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No. Not anyone's child, including the Bush's.
2007-02-14 10:34:42 · answer #6 · answered by blank 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Grow up. There is no connection. You can get stem cell from umbilical cord blood. No babies hurt there. Stop trying to control my life for your benefit.
2007-02-14 11:02:36 · answer #7 · answered by Mother 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Yes, let's use the Bush twins first.
.
2007-02-14 10:28:33 · answer #8 · answered by Brotherhood 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
your question is kinda extreme , but i like the point behind it.
2007-02-14 10:37:51 · answer #9 · answered by ALunaticFriend 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
no.
2007-02-14 10:31:17 · answer #10 · answered by Shelbi. 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋