Non stop full blast NPR untill you die.
2007-02-14 10:22:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by type2negative 4
·
4⤊
3⤋
The neighborhood you speak of would necessarily be populated by known terrorists - and, as the saying goes, if you lie down with dogs..........
Added for comment: Facial features have nothing to do with my answer - the United States military does not drop bombs randomly on neighborhoods - killing indiscrimently is strickly a terrorist tactic -. If a neighborhood was indeed targeted, you can bet there's a damned good reason to know it is a terrorist strong hold.
2007-02-14 18:24:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
Well, if you know anything about how Arabs behead people, you would probably choose the bomb. Beheading is a slower process. It's gruesome, and I would imagine - very painful.
2007-02-14 19:04:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jenny A_331 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, you sure wouldn't have much time to consider your fate with the bomb, would you?
I'd rather be bombed than beheaded. Those poor bastards knew what was coming.
Pretty sick question.
2007-02-14 19:05:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Lola 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Beheading takes longer....the bomb is a quicker way to die.
2007-02-14 18:22:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Misery loves company,I'll take the bomb!
2007-02-14 18:33:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Classic96 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Since beheading kills 1 person, and a 1,000 lb bomb kills the whole neighborhood, the answer is obvious.
2007-02-14 18:20:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by Longhaired Freaky Person 4
·
1⤊
4⤋
Well, since there is no such thing as the bomb you list, I have to say beheading.
2007-02-14 18:22:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by nazilover1488 2
·
3⤊
3⤋
Silly little foreigner.
2007-02-14 18:22:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
What an uplifting question. I'll take the bomb please.
2007-02-14 18:20:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Sin Sister 1
·
3⤊
1⤋