Which do you like better and why? For me, Raw is better. Raw has more action, better storylines, and better superstars
2007-02-14 09:56:59 · 28 answers · asked by Matt: aka; Edge is world champ!! 6 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
Let see.
RAW: A good tag-team division, Regular appearances by Mr.McMahon, more Divas, good storylines, very unpredictable, have 5 main eventers: Cena, HBK, Orton, Edge and Triple H.
Smackdown: Poor cruiserweight division, only 2 to 3 tag-teams, few Divas, only 2 main eventers: Batista and Undertaker.
Kind of one sided isn't it? RAW beats Smackdown by far. Smackdown has some pretty good talent but they are not being used properly. I used to love watching Smackdown but lately RAW has been very impressive so i say RAW is better.
P.S. Congrats on being the number one answerer in the wrestling section!
2007-02-14 10:34:18 · answer #1 · answered by CodeRed 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is hard to tell Smackdown has many great wwe superstars like The Undertaker and Batista dont forget Chris Benoit but Raw has many great superstars as in Triple H, John Cena, Shawn Micheals,Randy Orton, And Edge
2007-02-14 10:03:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i agree. Raw is better. Smackdown comes in at a close second. but Raw has the better Superstars.
2007-02-14 09:58:48 · answer #3 · answered by RAW DIVA™ 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I like both shows, but RAW has a shitty theme. They should either go back to the theme that they used before or the theme they used during the Attitude era. I agree that RAW has the best storylines and stars. Smackdown has better wrestling though. I like and watch both shows as well as ECW for different reasons.
2007-02-14 10:00:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If Smack-down were to change to ECW's time slot they would get about 1 hour less then what they have now. They would lose the ratings battles because they would have to make less feuds which make ratings go up so there would be no time for the Rey Mysterio feud with M.V.P and it would take the most time to do the World Championship feuds. ECW doesn't have enough talent to fill the full 2 hours. Sure there would be great matches like ECW Extreme rules but they would have to resort to matches like Kofi Kingston vs. Shelton Benjamen which would make ratings go down making them lose the battle. So that means that Raw would win the ratings battles. If they were to switch times it would basiclly be the same ratings just the show would be earlier, the channel would change, and the night.
2016-03-29 06:41:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
RAW, for the same reasons as you. Smackdown has a lot of people that are unknown or that suck, like Deuce and Domino. I like both, but RAW seems better than Smackdown.
2007-02-14 10:00:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Definitely RAW. It has more action, better better superstars, and storylines.
2007-02-15 21:54:29 · answer #7 · answered by Triple H 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Raw's got better superstars.
2007-02-15 07:14:33 · answer #8 · answered by iMitch 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
raw bcuz raw has the veteran superstars and divas..not like smackdown that catches all the new comers.. but to tell you SD also got undertaker,batista,benoit and mysterio wich is not bad. but for now i think i'm gonna go to Monday Night Raw..
2007-02-14 20:40:33 · answer #9 · answered by Gothic Knight *Xeron* (Part Timer) 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd say RAW becuase it hes better wrestlers except if The dead man Undertaker were in raw it would make it even better RAW is #1 especially YOU CAN'T SEE ME JOHN CENA
2007-02-14 10:48:52 · answer #10 · answered by Shirley Canela. 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋