oooh i feel a bit of a div!!! ive just asked the same question?!* yes they were awful, well no liam was awful, i thought he was taking the pee but maybe he wasn't! he sounded totally different on the 2nd song!!
Maybe the cigarettes and alcohol have finally taken there toll!!! Noel take the lead please...................
2007-02-14 09:21:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think Oasis are a band to listen to in your house, because although i love them i have seen them at wembly, earls court, v festival and Glastonbury, a total of 7 times and every time they have been very poor live, once at wembly Liam didn't even know where he was.
2007-02-14 17:13:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Loo 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
yes, to begin with he sounded a bit rusty. Like you say the rest more than made up for him, I was kind of wondering how much better it would have sounded if Noel had done more vocals.
2007-02-14 17:19:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by nacnuds 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
God, Oasis are awful aren't they! They made 2 good albums a decade ago and have done nothing but shite since. What the hell have they contributed to music?
2007-02-14 17:08:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
awful, Noel should be singing
2007-02-14 17:17:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by RAM 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
yes i thought so...rest of it though as u say is brill
2007-02-14 17:09:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by michelle m 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
i was disapointed,he was awful.
2007-02-14 17:06:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Alfred E. Newman 6
·
1⤊
1⤋