Im for Rudy Guiliani right now.
But Mitt Romney and McCain also make good candidates.
And no partisan b/s although i know itll happen.
2007-02-14 08:57:28 · 12 answers · asked by Indio 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Actually Rudy knows alot, when he took over office, New Yorks population was declining he got that reversed.
Gun violence was out of control, it dropped dramatically.
And it was a city in debt, he gave it a surplus.
Thats why im for him, his economics are unbeatable!
2007-02-14 09:03:30 · update #1
If Newt Gingrich decides not to run, the best candidate would be Condaleeza Rice. The problem is, it appears she genuinely does not want to hold the office of President. Considering how savage (and completely biased) the press is, who can blame her?
Condi is one of those very rare people who is extremely intelligent, academically and professionally accomplished, has many outside interests (music, sports, working out), and has a likeable personality.
It's easy for people to throw mud at Bush, but in our Politically Correct world, can you imagine how difficult it will be for people to denigrate a BLACK WOMAN? Hah! Finally, a positive side to the PC madness.
Condi gets into the White House, and suddenly foreign governments can't take their typical anti-America stance. Damn, this is just genius!
2007-02-14 09:07:53 · answer #1 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
If she would run, I'd say Condoleeza Rice. Unfortunately, she doesn't seem to be planning on it -- and frankly, what a waste of good character. Newt Gingrich would be pretty good too, but I don't know if he's running or even considering. For now, it's a toss-up between Rudy Giuliani and Mitt Romney: aside from a few quirks, they seem OK.
2007-02-14 17:07:02 · answer #2 · answered by Richard S 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Rudy Guiliani was a city mayor. What in the world does he know about international and national politics?
2007-02-14 17:00:45 · answer #3 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
between those 3 Romney
I don't trust Guiliani, never liked him, he's a fakey for lack of a better word, couldn't even stand his BS right after 911
chances are I won't vote for any of those three or any other Republican though
I think of all the people out there, Al Gore is the best person
2007-02-14 17:06:49 · answer #4 · answered by anonacoup 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I will agree that Guiliani is the ONLY viable candidate for either party right now.
He has the experience to lead, he is a moderate... and not some loon spewing hate.
2007-02-14 17:02:57 · answer #5 · answered by Dog Lover 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Walter Williams. He is a professor of economics at George Mason and writes a syndicated editorial column. You can read his articles here:
http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/wew/articles.html
2007-02-14 17:11:22 · answer #6 · answered by Bob 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont think there is serious quality running in either party now.
Gore would do a better than avg job, but not great. I'd like to see Bill bradley run, but he's had enough of the insanity of political life.
I'd really like to see Rev Jim Wallis run, but he wont.
2007-02-14 17:01:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Newt Gingrich. Former Speaker of the House, that's closer to the Presidency than any other canidiates have been, and he has experience with politics of that nature, being around it for a long time.
2007-02-14 17:00:56 · answer #8 · answered by bigsey93harrison37 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
You and I are on the same wave length. Giuliani, followed by Romney and then McCain.
2007-02-14 17:01:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think Arnold should run for Pres.
2007-02-14 17:13:57 · answer #10 · answered by curiousnktown 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋