I think he would be great.
He is clean and sets a very high moral standard.
I am disagree with Mormoms but they are some of the most outstanding people as far as character you will ever meet.
The press would be hard press to dig up dirt on him.
2007-02-14 08:47:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
I don't know much about him. If good looks were the reason for voting for him he would win as he's the best looking of the crowd of contenders. The fact that he is Mormon doesn't bother me nor the fact that he is a Republican. I will have to hear him speak and watch his eyes. If his eyes are shifty I won't consider him.
2007-02-14 16:46:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
He's Ok, but I think Rudy has a better chance of beating Hillary. To me there's just not much point to it unless Republicans have a candidate that can do that.
2007-02-14 16:49:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by JudiBug 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
He appears to have changed his position on certain issues over the last few years. Maybe it's a Mass. thing, I don't know for sure.
My neighbor friend likes him.
2007-02-14 16:45:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by MoltarRocks 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I have researched him and I agree with you, he should be a strong candidate. He has liberal views concerning education and sometimes the economy, but conservative views concerning abortion and other moral issues, which is a good match. He seems real, which is what America needs right now.
2007-02-14 16:44:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Daniel 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
For the Republican Party, sure, he would make a stellar candidate.
2007-02-14 16:44:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jackson Leslie 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Better than anyone who the Dems can throw out, at least Mitt won't surrender to the Islamofacists.
2007-02-14 16:44:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by bigsey93harrison37 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
He's my front runner of all the Republican Candidates out there.
2007-02-14 16:49:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
He's too much of a social conservative to suit me. I would really like to see a fiscal conservative as president.
2007-02-14 16:44:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by .... . .-.. .-.. --- 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Uh, thanks but no thanks.
2007-02-14 16:45:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by puter_patty 4
·
0⤊
2⤋