just as much as opponent, basically equally qualified would you prefer a male in office still? and no i wasnt thinking about Hillary lol
2007-02-14 08:25:11 · 24 answers · asked by mala 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
No problem at all. My state is represented by two female Senators and both are doing a good job. Condi Rice is doing a good job and so is Hillary Clinton for her state of New York.
There have been female governors and even countries like Israel, India, and UK have had very formidable women as leaders. So, yes, if I believe she is the best qualified of those offered I would have no hesitation in voting for a woman.
2007-02-14 08:38:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I would prefer a male in the office of President because of the difference in psychological makeup between men and women and the problems created by misogynistic leaders of other nations. However, if a woman was well qualified, I would vote for her. (Not Hillary Clinton, woman or otherwise)
2007-02-14 08:32:36 · answer #2 · answered by Sorge2000 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I did, her call replaced into Hillary Clinton. decrease back even as i replaced right into a Democrat till i realized Dems were the blindest of human beings even as they %. Obama over her. She replaced into the only top wish I had for the Democratic celebration as she might want to have made an magnificent President and as a lady i might want to were particularly pleased with seeing her up there. Then no longer in elementary words did the Democratic celebration celebration knock Hillary out they bash McCain because he had a lady Vice-President operating mate. so as open minded as Dem's declare to be and how they claimed the GOP to be against women individuals, it really is marvelous to work out that their moves are some distance different from their words. I switched over to the GOP after the 08 election.
2016-11-03 11:09:42 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course. If she was a good candidate and stood for issues I believed in, I certainly would. Hillary will get a lot of votes just for being a woman even though she's a poor candidate.
2007-02-14 08:38:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely, trouble I cant trust Hillary, she flips on issues very important to me.. she voted for the IRAQ war now she says she was misled.. well she can be misled all her life for all i know if she ever gets to be a the supreme commander, but she will not be my choice.. in fact I will SIFT all candidates , repukes and Dumocrats , if any sided with the IMMORAL war in Iraq then he is out my list, not only that I will impose another qualifier, future prez must put AMERICA first, and not a single US causality should be shed for Israel , Iraq , Afghanistan or the likes...
I don't want a prez who is sold to foreign lobby ( zionist neocons to Israel)...
2007-02-14 08:28:53 · answer #5 · answered by LEE DA 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If she was qualified I would consider a woman. At this time I would not prefer a male.
2007-02-14 09:01:08 · answer #6 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have no problem voting for whoever I think the best candidate is, no matter if it is a man or a woman or someone in between. As long as I feel they can do the job the best, and they represent my views and feelings on most issues, I would vote for them.
2007-02-14 08:30:21 · answer #7 · answered by kdc1018 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i dunno...what u have look at is all the women who have been in power have started wars (i dont actually mind aslong as its for a good reason). I was about to say Hillary is deffinately not qualified lol
2007-02-14 08:27:49 · answer #8 · answered by thanatos 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A lot of men would be totally against electing a lady for president, and the Bible does say that only men should be leaders. Religion might be a reason a lot of people are against a female president.
2007-02-14 08:35:10 · answer #9 · answered by Caroline 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldnt have a problem voting for a woman running for president.
2007-02-14 08:37:18 · answer #10 · answered by BUTTERFLY 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋