Is war just a theory..........?

Question

Because Generals use war theory to understand how to fight wars?

http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/awc-thry.htm

So much for the claim evolution is "just a theory".

Do people bother to read questions, or just type the first thing that leaks into their heads?

Answer 1

Thats a very bad comparison. War is something that can be seen by people. Unlike evolution. When is the last time you saw an Ape straighten up and turn into a human?

Answer 2

no guns and weapons kill people, wars dont always involve physical conflict. To declare 'war' one something is just to say that you are against it. The rest is just how you manipulate the meaning to justify your needs. This is the political side of it.

However, in real combat, war isnt just a theory. War is also about history, something that has already happened. What generals do is they study the history and what might have 'theoretically' happened if they used different tactics, rearranged positions or maybe attacked in different weather. They take the data they need and use it to form a strategy.

Answer 3

nicely that's frustrating to draw close till all of it works out, top? on the face of it at the moment, it does no longer look a only war, as we've unleashed violent forces that were kept in examine by technique of Saddam. also, we are dealing with a lengthy war in Iraq, possibly yet another 10 years. Will this "surge" instruct non everlasting in reward? Is the surge particularly a "benefit" or somewhat only a lessening of persisted suffering? In different words, might want to we are saying that searching in elementary words 25 useless bodies on the streets of Iraq each and every morning is more desirable sensible than one hundred? also, is it sturdy or evil to have armed and educated the numerous factions? might want to they no longer turn guns on one yet another in the adventure that they couldn't discover political lodging? you likely can argue that leaving Iraq will reason more desirable suffering than staying does, so that's "sturdy". yet when invading starting up the issue, how can the war be finally "sturdy"? In different words, how can one be morally rewarded for fixing a situation one began in the first position? does no longer finished restitution to the Iraqi human beings be needed, and prosecution of the individuals who began this war on behalf of u . s . a .?

Answer 4

Theories are not the same thing as "scientific theory".

A theory in everday usage is just a speculation, or an opinion on an outcome. Scientific theory is "A set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena, especially one that has been repeatedly tested or is widely accepted and can be used to make predictions about natural phenomena."

There's a difference.

Answer 5

It is just a theory until you are the one fighting in the foxholes and getting blown up by the IEDs.
Politicians don't fight wars, they send the best and brightest to do their fighting for them, than cutting down on the future competition for their jobs.

Answer 6

No cat, war is not a theory. Trust me.

Answer 7

Ask all the families of soldiers who have been killed in a war if it is just a theory.

Answer 8

Do you actaully read what you write or do you just run off at the mouth just to hear yourself talk?

Answer 9

Theories don't kill people...wars do.

Answer 10

that cat is creepy.....