Because Democrats don't like to see a President embarrassed before the whole world on TV asking nasty questions and still only the congress impeached him, not the Senate. He won a second term after all these millions was spent. The day the congress voted to impeach they voted their new Speaker of The House, Livingston and he resigned the same day because in LA. he had been having a affair for 20 years with another woman. Henry Hyde that was backing all this slander against Clinton had a 20 year old son from a affair he had been having, he was still married the child born out of wedlock it just went on and on about the Republicans, but their morals are so outstanding. Old Newt Gingrich was put out of office that is the reason Livingston was taking his place, was having a affair and finally divorced his wife and married his mistress. What a wicked web they weave,
but they thought that was okay for them but not Clinton. Their just ignorant the whole caboddle of them they ended up putting Old big Hasert in their vacated office, when Livingston resigned. Hasert hold back all these Pages slander on Foley. They shouldn't ever run anybody down.
2007-02-14 07:45:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Clinton lied to a grand jury . When people like you stop waving away the crimes of the Clinton's , we'll all be better off . That was just a drop in the bucket to the crimes of the Clinton's . If Bill & Hillary Clinton did something in the White House besides dismantle our military ; comprimise national security - and refuse capture of bin Laden , maybe George W. Bush wouldn't still be cleaning up after them .
Let me get this right..so long as the Clinton's aren't serial killers , they can do whatever they like to America ? Somebody tell Buppy up there that the following democrats are worth millions :
John Kerry-$620 million
John Edwards-$15 million
Ted Kennedy -$30 million
John Corzine-$400 million
Diane Feinstein -50 million
Herb Kohl -$300 million
Hillary Clinton; Harry Reid - MILLIONS..who knows the amount because they never declare ..
2007-02-14 07:34:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by missmayzie 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Because even the Bar association believed that Clinton was too dishonest to be a LAWYER!!!
How much honesty does the public believe that profession has???
Anyway how much investigation money is being thrown at the CIA leak investigation witch hunt. Sure someone may have mentioned the name, but the real person that made the fact that Valeri Plame was from the CIA was her husband trumpeting that it was leaked. Until the left tried to politicize it the leak (even though published) was not common knowledge to everyone.
How much has been spent trying to associate various people with Abramoff, or Enron etc.
In modern politics if you Lie and are caught you get in trouble. Although often accused, no-one can prove with DNA (or other)evidence that Bush lied.
2007-02-14 09:09:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dr Fred 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Actually, the Clintons can be considered of "serial killer quality"... if you look at the list of people who have died under self-imposed or suspicious circumstances near them, it is terrifying. There are over 35 people on that list.
Clinton is also a known liar, terrorist and drug-dealer freer, and cheater.
Clinton was not investigated for an "affair" but for lying UNDER OATH and for lying bald-faced to the American people. To insinuate otherwise is to ignore the entire situation. Get your facts and history straight and then we'll talk.
2007-02-14 08:42:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Goose&Tonic 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Easy, the democrats are spineless weenies, and the republcans are ruthless and will look for any scandle possible.
It's not a matter of whose crime was worse, its a matter of whose keeping checks and balances on the other party.
We chose to boot the republicans last election, and now our "Beloved" democrats are just screwing us... They've done nothing along the lines of the reasons we voted them in. And they WONT, theyll just wait til 08, and both parties will just talk about how each side is bad and does nothing...
MAN I HATE POLITICS IN THIS COUNTRY!
2007-02-14 07:27:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by eldeeder 3
·
4⤊
1⤋
"WE ALL" have NOT wondered about that. At least I haven't. Clinton committed a crime then lied under oath about it. A larger crime. Then he denied it over and over right to our face via the TV camera.
Please do name the crime that Bush has committed... I know for sure if he'd really committed a crime, someone would be all over it.
2007-02-14 07:29:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by capnemo 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
Because, when you commit perjury in a court of law and your the President of the United States, it makes it a big deal. Bush has never done something as stupid as that.
2007-02-14 07:25:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by raiderking69 5
·
5⤊
1⤋
People need to get real. The man got a BJ in the oval office. For this it was worth spending millions of dollars to impeach him?? Think of how many homeless and hungry children that would have fed and clothed.
2007-02-14 08:01:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Chris S 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Clinton lied under oath, no matter how white of a lie it was, it was still a crime. Maybe Bush has lied, but it has not been under oath.
2007-02-14 07:25:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
I actual have heard the exact same element. I actual have heard that there become more beneficial spend on the Clinton/Lewinski analyze than they spent on the 9/11 fee. i recognize that one ought to contain each and every of the prices incurred through the various authorities entities of their investigations and/or conceal-ups, as well. that is why it truly is tricky to state no matter if the analyze on the topic of 9/11 become more beneficial intense priced than the Clinton/Lewiski analyze become. there is little question that a lengthy way a lot less money become spent on the 9/11 fee's analyze than become spent on the Clinton/Lewinski affair. it is been reported that the 9/11 fee become in trouble-free words disbursed $15 million and that the Clinton/Lewinski invertigation become disbursed $40 million. it truly is exciting that you suggested testimony. What i fairly opt for to understand is why there have been key eyewitness thoughts that were skipped over from the 9/11 fee record? There are a number of that come to ideas. William Rodriguez become the rescue hero of 9/11 because it wasn't his pastime to position himself in probability. He turned right into a janitor who had a draw close key to the WTC complicated. He led the firefighters up the locked stairwells. human beings use the time period "hero" a lengthy way too gently at present. actually everyone must be a hero. no longer many will be because it skill doing some thing that you aren't from now on envisioned to do. i'm no longer announcing that the firefighters were no longer courageous. They were. They were no longer heroes because it become their pastime to do what they did. Willie had no such pastime description. He nonetheless did it. it truly is heroic. He become the finest guy out og the North Tower previously the crumple and he testified that there become an excellent explosion from between the sub-basement ranges seconds previously the first airliner struck the WTC. it truly is exciting that Ginny Carr's aduio recording from the minutes of a assembly reflect the exact same element. I digress. Willie's testimony become submitted to the 9/11 fee. It not in any respect regarded in the finest record. speaking of testimony, how about each and every of the firefighters and different rescue personell who suggested bombs in the homes? exciting how key first hand eyewitness debts are surpassed over, is it no longer? i do not recognize what the finished quantity of money that become spent upon the collective 9/11 fee and parallel investigations, notwithstanding it become actually both no longer sufficient, or a lengthy way too a lot judging through the outcomes.
2016-11-28 02:22:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋