So Dumbyah once again is displaying supposed evidence of a country's attempts to kill Americans with the accusations against Iran.
Once again, some officials (in this case, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff) are publicly disagreeing with the Dumbyah.
So here is the question, and maybe someone has already asked Dumbyah, but:
"How can we depend on any evidence that is based on intelligence coming from your administration after the "WMD in Iraq" debacle?
You and your administration were as certain of WMDs in Iraq as you claim to be now with the Iranian government supplying weapons to the insurgency in Iraq."
2007-02-14 07:11:44 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Ripcord 3-Good point. I guess I can provide intelligence as crap@y as our government's.
2007-02-14 09:01:40 · update #1
We can't depend on any evidence/intelligence from this administration. It's all skewed and biased. Sure, Bush wants to hear what people think-but only if they agree with what he thinks. Why do you think he only speaks to supporters and surrounds himself with yes-men?
2007-02-14 07:16:22 · answer #1 · answered by Julia Sugarbaker 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
In the present environment escalation in Iraq would seem incentive for anti US forces to escalate efforts dramatically in an all out effort to continue to destabilize Iraq and thus further prove Bushes blunder in Iraq. Furthermore it is difficult for me to believe that those in the know at the executive level are not perfectly aware that the chances are better than good that escalation in Iraq will incur acts of terrorism in the slums exponentially. The only explanation I can fathom is that they are intentionally fanning the flames for the purpose of producing terrorists acts heretofore unimagined in order to justify threading the war on into Iran and procure the funding required to do so. Increase in rhetoric concerning Iran’s weapons and munitions support that has historically already been known for years only lends credibility to this assessment.
2007-02-14 16:26:07 · answer #2 · answered by Daniel O 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I suppose a more obvious question would be "why did we supply Saddam with weapons to kill Iranians?"
To paraphrase Sun Tzu: what makes my enemy weaker makes me stronger.
If the draft dodgers in Washington ever obtain some intelligence (mental as opposed to military) they wouldn't be so quick to waste the lives of our youth on this foolishness.
2007-02-15 08:00:36 · answer #3 · answered by rick m 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Didn't the Democrats see the same intelligence and didn't they also agree at that time with the President?
2007-02-14 15:17:04 · answer #4 · answered by evildragon1952 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
My question is, why don't Bush and the Intelligence come to you for the answers?
2007-02-14 16:23:06 · answer #5 · answered by Auburn 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
some one asked yesterday on this program, why the markings on those devices are printed in English, maybe that is where they are manufactured.
2007-02-14 21:10:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well i really dont know on this one thier track record sucks but people make mistakes and to the silly cows above the dems never agreed with this only very few when this all started you re-PUBES were in power
2007-02-14 15:21:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Your best platform for your above statement would be in congress dont you think??....yahoo is the wrong forum...sorry...
2007-02-14 15:22:56 · answer #8 · answered by ozzy chik... 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
reading all kinds of newspapers
2007-02-14 15:21:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋