2007-02-14 06:44:13 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health ➔ Men's Health
Uncut is better for you, as it retains the nerve endings in the foreskin, and the foreskin protects the glans (head) from friction which coarsens and numbs it.
Surprisingly, uncut is also better for the woman in your life. Take a look at http://www.healthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html
Keep what you've got. A lot of guys would give almost anything to be uncut. http://www.norm.org
2007-02-14 08:41:54 · answer #1 · answered by Maple 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The majority of men in the world are uncut. There is no medical reason for circumcision. Both the American Medical Association and the American Pediatric Assocation agree this is unnecessary.
A foreskin has many nerve endings that add to sexual stimulation. If you never had a foreskin, you don't miss that; but if you have it removed as an adult, you will notice a difference. The foreskin also protects the head of the penis, keeping that sensitive. When you are circumcised, the head develops a protective layer of keratin which does not contain any nerves; so the head becomes less sensitive.
Since you are not circumcised, and there is no medical reason to circumcise, I would strongly advise you to stay as you are.
2007-02-14 09:45:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No real answer. Certainly overall in the scheme of things, how can natural (uncut) be worse than cut? I'm cut, like a lot of guys in the US, but also like most of them, it was not my choice.
2007-02-14 09:51:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well the only thing wrong with an uncut is that you cant see what your getting until it gets hard there is no telling whats hideing under there
2007-02-14 09:29:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Uncut. It keeps you more sensitive.
2007-02-14 08:07:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
uncut.
Date: 01/21/2004
'Female arousal disorder' blamed on circumcised penises
A New Zealand study found that reduced female arousal and fewer female orgasms
may be linked to women having sex with circumcised male partners. Women reported
they were about twice as likely to experience orgasm if their male partner had a
foreskin.
Nine out of ten women prefer having sex with intact men, the study finds.
"Presence of the movable foreskin makes a difference in foreplay, being more
arousing to the female," the study says. "Most likely, reported vaginal dryness
and the related clinical designation `female arousal disorder' is but a normal
female response to coitus with a man with an iatrogenically [doctor caused]
deficient penis."
The foreskin is double-layered. During intercourse, the moist and pliant
foreskin rolls past itself massaging the vagina and exciting it more than the
'dry stick' of a circumcised penis. The foreskin keeps the glans moist and soft
aiding in foreplay, insertion, and intercourse. Dry or painful sex is the number
one sexual complaint of women in the United States.
"During intercourse, the skin of an intact penis slides up and down the shaft,
stimulating the glans and the nerves of the inner and outer foreskin. On the
outstroke, the glans is partially or completely engulfed by the foreskin with
more skin remaining inside the vagina than is the case with the circumcised
penis. This `valve' mechanism is thought to retain the natural lubrication
provided by the female because the bunched up skin acts to block the lubrication
escaping from the vagina, which results in dryness."
About 70% of American men alive today are circumcised. About 60% of U.S. baby
boys are circumcised each year
2007-02-14 10:14:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Whatever floats your boat. How can anyone say which is "better"? All men are one or the other, and both seem to work.
Chow!!
2007-02-14 07:59:11 · answer #7 · answered by No one 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋