Would it require Genocide to win the war on Terror??? I see this as a conundrum we know the source of terror?

Question

But to end the threat would require sevier measures.

No muslims are not the source of terror.

Most muslims are stuck in this like a man in a failing parachute.

I find it strange what people read into this question.

Is it pulling at the secret strings of desire.

Answer 1

It might require "moderate" muslims to take back their "peaceful" religion from the terrorists. It might require them to even fight them. But,I'm not going to hold my breath.

Answer 2

It replaced into winnable even as it wasn't a war yet. even as it grew to develop into top right into a conflict of 'us' against 'them' it unexpectedly grew to develop into very a lot more desirable strong to win, although. possibly guns will win the war, usa of u . s . a . has particularly made damned particular that in the time of the advise time there is no longer any different way ahead. i have were given no longer were given self assurance that, although. so a ideas the in elementary words element the guns have executed is provoke a severe backlash against the west, really pondering each and every and each and every of the strong will after 9/11. It inspite of the reality that amazes me how that replaced into squandered. Can the war on terror be received? possibly, the question is, is it nicely particularly nicely well worth the fee?

Answer 3

This is the one of the scariest things about the "war on terror". I hear people talking about all Muslims, not just extremists. When I was in line voting, the guy next to me confided all Muslims and Arabs should be rounded up...we're heading down a dangerous road.

“Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.” — Former Nazi Reich Marshal Hermann Göring while in his jail cell during the Nuremberg Trials

Answer 4

I'm going to have to disagree with you on this one. See terrorists are not just Muslim extremists. There are so many other groups who carry out terrorism every day. The Basque people in Spain, Christian fundamentalist in the U.S.A. (although they are lucky enough to do it from inside our own government), the IRA in Ireland, and many more. So in order to take out all terror, it would not be genocide you are talking about, as it is not one race of people performing terror acts.

And the threat of terrorism, no matter what the government wants us to believe, is not as serious as many other issues purkalating. Their best strike killed 3,000 of our countryment and women. Now I'm not saying that it wasn't bad, because of course it was, but that is a very insignificant number when taken on the grand scale of things. Its time we get over ourselves and let them fight it out.

Like I've said before in 20-30 years when the oil runs out in the Middle East, the rest of the world will forget about them because they act like a bunch of children. They don't have what it takes to play the game in big-boy world, and all they do have is oil, which the ruling classes keep all the profits from and offer little or no assistance to those of lesser fortune in their respective countries. If you think Wal-Mart is bad, try working for one of the oil conglomerates in the Middle East. That's why we need to just suck them dry of their oil and after that let them fight it out on their own.

As upsetting as that may be, think about the only reason we are there right now? What is going on in places like Darfur and Somalia is much worse than anything Saddam Hussein ever did, problem is they don't have what we need and thus they are pretty worthless to us as a nation.

I'm not saying we shouldn't help, but its all driven by economics and that's just the damned truth. If the Sudan or Somalia had something to offer we would be in there in a heartbeat, if not faster. But unfortunately for them, they do not, thus we are fighting a desert war and trying to get our oil supply that way. Its really quite elementary when one looks at all the sides of the issue. Thanks and have a nice day.

Answer 5

Genocide would guarantee that someday, someone would try to settle the score. We would be living on borrowed time.

Besides, we're not against any certain race, nationality, or religion. Islam is supposed to be a peaceful religion, but it has been hijacked by the Islama-fascists who refuse to let democracy guide their countries.

Would you kill off all the Kuwaitis? They are our friends.

How about the Egyptians? If they are not our friends then we are wasting Billions of dollars every year since we are their biggest contributor of foreign aid.

Answer 6

Jesus!! Have we all gone back down to basics here. Kill kill kill, kill them all that's what we say. Have you lost your freaking minds? Because of Bush, we know have a personal vendetta against Muslims, middle easterns and Islamics.
Hitler wanted everyone to be Blue eyed, Blonde haired, though he wasn't. Genocide is what he wanted and 12million people later he had a good start to it.
If Bush and our beloved government stage another terror attack on American soil, Genocide might happen.
When will the masses understand that they're trying to control us in to believing what they say is right and standing up against it is an act of terrorism. Please wake up!!

Answer 7

Right now we're focused on the Middle-East / Islamic threat but, terrorism comes from all sides (as McVay showed us). In taking more severe measures, we lose our humanity and forfeit any moral superiority we may have.

Have a nice day!

Answer 8

No, genocide is not the answer to anything, not to mention it is nigh near impossible to do. This question is absurd, I'd tell you why, but it would take me days to point out the entirety of it's stupidity.

Answer 9

Isn't using genocide to end a "War on Terror" a bit like using rape to end a "War on Chastity?"

When you hold the attitudes of a terrorist, use the tactics of a terrorist, and create the same results/suffering of a terrorist, what exactly makes you different from a terrorist?

Answer 10

If by Genocide you refer to the eradication of all Muslim Extremists, I'd say yes!