LMAO . Yesterday, my friend was explaining the crazy thoughts and beliefs of his Liberal ex-wife school teacher . I can't post exactly what we said, but suffice it to say that we used the 'murderer' example too !!
class would go something like this :
Billy : Ms. Jones, Tommy has a knife and stabbed several students .
Ms. Jones : Now, now Billy, we must be accepting of all others and all of their beliefs too .
Billy : But I'm bleeding !!
Ms. Jones : One more interruption Billy and you'll be suspended under our new Political Correctness Act and we have a Zero Tolerance Policy .
Billy : But..
Ms.Jones : Now I want everyone in the class to tell Tommy that they're sorry .
Class : We're sorry for complaining about your knife Tommy .
Billy : I'm still bleeding Ms. Jones !!
Ms. Jones : That's it !!! Your suspended !!!
2007-02-14 05:53:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Libs (like Pip) only preach tolerance when it comes to anything anti-establishment. That's where "liberal" comes from, bucking tradition in favor of "progression". Look at the ACLU for a prime example of an organization that only selectively stands up for civil liberties.
It is rare to find the liberal on Yahoo! who will even tolerate any debate on the issues that doesn't line up to their ideology. I just saw a question about why Liberals like Amahdenijad so much. One guy responded that he had just reported the questioner, and I noticed it's been removed. This, from the people who admittedly advocate much better for free speech than me and my kind.
Respecting religious beliefs are the big thing right now, unless those beliefs are Christian in nature.
Did you know that the supremists, who once used to be mostly Democrat but left during the LBJ years, are now returning to the Democratic party in record numbers? They are attracted by hypocrisy and intolerance.
2007-02-14 06:09:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Whootziedude 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
i comprehend you especially point out the matters of race and homosexuality. yet you may additionally prepare this familiar to the different difficulty. What occurs whilst one quickly opposes the different? there is not any longer something we are in a position to do related to how human beings have self belief. We settle for them for who they are even nonetheless we don't settle for what they do. Now does open-minded grow to be closed as quickly as we don't settle for what they do? So whilst gay rights arise, that's misguided in accordance to an extremely large group of folk, why won't be in a position to those that disagree, do basically that - disagree? It now turns into opinion as to who's open minded and who isn't, homosexuals or people who think of that habit is misguided. habit does have a amazing and incorrect. and that's the different subject, some equate homosexuality with race and a few do no longer. that heavily isn't agreed upon.
2016-10-02 03:23:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
theres difference between murder and death penalty.
The death penalty is a punishment to those that commit murder. If you cant differentiate that, then you shouldnt ask this question.
the act of murder itself is wrong.
Murder is killing another person.
The circumstances behind murder are sometimes forgivable.
If you cant tell the difference between someone who goes around molesting little kids then burying them alive, and will keep doing it, until the father of one avenges the child he raised then you really need to reevaluate your morals.
If you cant see that some people who go around and rape then murder pretty girls, and will keep doing it unless they are put away and put down, then I say you have never experienced it first hand with someone doing that to your family or friends.
Its a haneous crime, and in this time where people are so self rightcheous they put more rights for the criminals and blame the victims its pathetic to see.
And I leave saying, would those that oppose thedeath penalty maintain their position if there son, brother, cousin or friend was kidnapped molested for a year, then cut up into little pieces or buried alive? And would they maintain their position and want to live on the same block as a released molester of said crime?
People are so dumb is funny sometimes
2007-02-14 05:48:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by writersbIock2006 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Tolerance is what america needs yes,
But being too tolerant, makes us a doormat.
murder: Taking another's life intentionally.
kay so there are many ways to go about this, there is what bush is doing, - murder.
there is Jeffery Dohmer's murders
and then abortion, murder
and accidental murder.
self defense murder.
wehich one of these is acceptable?
Do you think Jeffery Dhomer should be let go, because we need to be accepting and tolerant?
I think not.
But what if Some one was goinfg to kill me, so i had to defend myself, but all of a sudden was on trial for murder, is that acceptable.
Or if my daughter got raped and murdered, after I was finished with t6hat guy, believe me it would be more than murder. But l;aws see no differance4, Murder is murder. And on that point, I think you should be open minded,
There are many aspects of murder. Use common sense to depict whats acceptable/forgivable.
or not.
2007-02-14 05:51:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
keep ur own opinion strong but being open minded is always a great way to expand ur way of thinking in a very possitive way. think of it this way....not everyone will always have the same opinion as u have. hope this helps!
2007-02-14 05:44:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ashley 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I always thought that killing was wrong.. but then all these religious people came up to me and said that the death penalty was good and that God supported it and then they told me that even though it's ok to kill, abortion is wrong... I was confused at first.. but I just drank some kool-aid and I feel a lot better now...... blah blah blah blah blah blah.................. it's obvious you don't understand what being open minded and being liberal truly mean.
2007-02-14 05:48:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by pip 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
If you vote for the right politicians very soon they may have bill for rights of a murderer. And we can pay taxes to spend on their rehabilitation program.
2007-02-14 05:42:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by a1b2c3d4test 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
I appreciate your satire.
Remember the lessons of the Roman Empire? When they gave up their morals.... they crumbled.
2007-02-14 05:46:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Dog Lover 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Maybe you should let them kill you and see how it works for you.
2007-02-14 05:42:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋