English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is it common to look back at past memories with such fond recollection, that they appear better than when the event transpired itself. I'm referring to pleasant memories or just memories of an event that might have benign in itself, but meant something personally to you.

Does this happen to you when you look back?
Is this a common way for people to think?

2007-02-14 05:35:55 · 10 answers · asked by cap3382 4 in Social Science Psychology

10 answers

Yes, bravo! Memory is more like dreams than video tape. I studied memory in grad school for a semester, and they actually did this study: When the Challenger blew up, this one psychologist had the presence of mind to go around to all his colleagues, in that very hour, and ask them to write down what they were doing when they heard the news. (This was one of those events that everyone remembers what they were doing for the rest of their life). He collected all the papers. Then five years later, he went around to all of them again and asked them again to write down what they were doing when they heard. There was WIDE discrepancy! Even on something like that.

Memory is entirely fluid, not at all strictly accurate.

2007-02-14 05:40:55 · answer #1 · answered by All hat 7 · 0 0

Yes definately for me anyways. The present always seems less interesting or exciting compared to events of the past, especially if I've been working hard or making personal sacrifices for a very long time and feel the need for a radical change. Often I even want to relive an entire year because it seemed so great even though I realize now how much things had changed for the better since then, materialy and psychologicaly. I think most people think this way but they don't express it because the past is often deressing.

2007-02-14 05:42:14 · answer #2 · answered by Liam R 3 · 0 0

The older we get, the more we remember earlier memories.

Given that the mind has an inbuilt 'self-protection clause' which deludes us into believing that we will live forever... and thus refutes death... well.

Memories recontruct who we are as individuals. The notion that Holocaust survivors have 'false memory syndrom' is as disgusting as the notion that Spain didn't rape Central and South America.

There is a possibility that the mind, per se, is self-delusional. Then again, possibly, the BRAIN is 'firing' on less than 'one-cylinder'. BAD metaphor... but is it?

We apparently use less than one-tenth of our brains. Which puts on the 'why are we the top of the food chain' list.

Simple: we are omnivores. By choice or no, we survive. And that is the whole point. We are prepared, in a time of necessity, to eat our neighbours.

Eat anything. To survive.

Paul

2007-02-14 06:10:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't think that pre-life and death are the same. I am a Christian, and I do believe in the Christian God. but where i differ from many of my fellow Christians is my belief in science. I believe that God created the rules of science so that his universe(s) would have practical order. However, science can be faulty, world renowned scientists can have a theory, and days, months, years later it is disproved. Hey, i'm not saying that God has ever been proven wrong, because He did believe that people should have free will, but hey, whatcha gonna do about it? Scientifically speaking, the woman has the egg, which is alive, and the man has the sperm, which is alive. then they join together and poof! there you are!!! after death, those two parts, and everything that came from them are dead. I don't know what is before or after life, and I'm too scared to find out the answer, all i know is that both spiritually and practically, they are definitely not the same thing.

2016-05-23 22:37:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think because you saw them before, the memory is strongest. A memory is soemthing you dont forget. If something happened like you got raped or something, of course your going to remember it. Then, if it happens again and you manage to get away, your memory serves as a boost to the trauma of getting raped.

I hate looking back. It hurts too much because as in my teenage years, I've had so many hardships.

I have a very complex mind, others do too. Im just sayign it liek this because this is an answer.

Hope it helps.

2007-02-14 05:40:23 · answer #5 · answered by 0_0 1 · 0 0

I think it's a coping mechanism. In the moment things may not have seemed so fantastic. When we look back on good and bad memories we naturally want to get rid of the painful ones. I experience this all the time, and it really works for me.

2007-02-14 05:49:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hindsight is 20/20.

It is only in looking back that we can see the full picture. While experiencing something we are so often lacking bits of information. Like if we knew it was the last hug from our parents, the entire experience would have played out differently.

2007-02-14 06:24:14 · answer #7 · answered by chinch 2 · 0 0

I think if you are lucky this is true. In my family, some people view past memories only as hurtful and unhappy, while others view the same memory with positive feelings. I think it is personality driven.

2007-02-14 05:45:01 · answer #8 · answered by mliz55 6 · 0 0

Time does distort memory. Now wether the memory is good or bad It can and usually is distorted for the better or worse. It depends on the person.

2007-02-14 05:45:22 · answer #9 · answered by Ricky J. 6 · 0 0

If the details are fuzzy, it's easy to reminisce on the past through rose colored glasses. Since it's in the past, why not view it positively when it helped shape who we are rather than dwell on it negatively when we cannot change it? It's just as easy to remember the past as worse than it was, but what really matters is learning to be more than we were

2007-02-14 05:41:49 · answer #10 · answered by AMEWzing 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers