Yep, I admit. I voted for him.
But in my defense, consider the time and other choice. It wasn't much different than choosing between a clogged toilet or a hemorrhoid. Neither option was appealing but a choice had to be made.
If faced with the exact same decision in 2008, I'd choose Bush again.
2007-02-14 08:18:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I admit I voted for BUSH, and YES, I admit I made a HUGE mistake. A bigger mistake will be voting for another, "CLINTON". You beter watch out, you better not cry if you let Hillary come on by.
Hillary is more of a, "double talker" than Presidents Clinton, and the 2 BUSH's together. See the link below.
2007-02-14 06:11:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by tropicalstardancers 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
I do not think so. If you ask honestly the voters will hide their opinion for fear of exposure. Presidents do not rule the country. But certain policies of theirs and their conducting themselves are exposed. This remains as a good yardstick. Bush has proved to be the person the electorate did not want him to be; or at least the policies that he had taken are now being refuted. Anyhow that is democracy...
2007-02-14 06:22:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by atom45 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I did twice
I voted for a winner
Did you vote for a winner or a looser
Keep your Kerry bumpersticker it makes loosers easier to spot
No I do not agree lockstep with the President then again no one is right 100% of the time. Well maybe I am
2007-02-14 06:10:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
i'm a Democrat who voted for him in both elections and may want to gladly vote for him again today. Have human beings been deceived by technique of their authorities? no more desirable than familiar. yet opposite to prevalent opinion, this time the liars at the on the spot are not Republicans, inspite of allegations in the different case. The deceivers are Al Gore, Hillary Clinton, Dianne Feinstein, Nancy Pelosi, Ted Kennedy, Jimmy Carter, bill Clinton and any form of alternative Democrats who have self assurance that in the adventure that they make adequate stink, no count how unwarranted, their competition will fall. nicely, the following is a marketing campaign frame of mind for the Democrats: human beings are not stupid. they want their authorities to guard them from yet another 9/11. they want monetary safe practices. they opt to deliver our troops homestead after the challenge is achieved, and not in any respect in the previous. they want FEMA, DHS, CIA, NSA, FBI and different federal agencies restructured, and managed nicely. they want helpful Constitutional judges on the bench, and they want the authorities to diminish their taxes. As a Democrat, i'm ashamed that bill Clinton's 8 years were one of those waste. i'm ashamed that he did not accomplish something more desirable than deliver ridicule to the Oval place of work. If Clinton replaced into any social gathering of how Democrats might want to manage the country, God help us. My comments are decidedly negative, yet does that advise I that i visit change my celebration loyalty? No. I nevertheless opt to carry out wish for Truman Democrats. yet at the moment, ensure, skill, loyalty, and determination belong to President Bush. i'm proud to call him my Commander-in-chief, and that i experience that he will proceed to face strong inspite of the negative political rhetoric against him.
2016-11-03 10:53:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. I voted for him and stand behind my vote. Much better than John Kerry. What a turd!
However, I do have to admit I am a little disappointed in the handling of the Iraq war and related subsequent events.
People underestimate the extreme pressures and problems of winning a difficult war.
2007-02-14 05:43:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by casey_leftwich 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
I'll admit to voting for him in 2000, but did not in 2004, basically because of the war in Iraq. I feel he deceived the American people, and ruined our reputation around the world.
2007-02-14 05:45:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by ces1958@verizon.net 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
Yes I voted for him and am admitting it here. I agree he isnt the smartest president, but his low approval rating is basicly par with most presidents over this last century. He is better than karry, and better than any democrat really. Because at the least he supports the troops and tries to give them the money, the support and the armor they need to win the war. The dems just want to de-fund the war and are willing to lose a war with a seriousely scary enemy just to prove bush wrong, sounds like their priorities are all messed up.
2007-02-14 05:39:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
America had two chances to vote for Bush and we voted him in both times. Obviously he's doing something right. Most of our presidents have been cowards just to look good. Bush is a real American. He doesn't take anyone's sh*t. He sticks up for America.
2007-02-14 05:44:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
Yes there are many proud Bush-ites. I would hide my face in shame if I voted for that man.
2007-02-14 05:40:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Suki 4
·
3⤊
2⤋