The Indiana Smoking while driving with kids ban?

Question

I do think this Ban could be very good since second hand smoke has proven to be very dangerous. I do not smoke so I guess I am one sided on this. However it does make me ask a few questions....

#1 it said it would ban kids 13 or under from being in a car when your smiking..... Why until 13, arent kids 13-18 important also? Arent those the kids the try the age groups that watch every movement we make?

#2 Doesnt the smoke stay in the interior of the car when it is smoked in when the kids are not in the car?

#3 If they smoke, the children will still be trapped in the home with the same parents that smoke. Is this not just as bad?

#4 they are writting it that they wont stop you for smoking but will fine you once they have you stopped. Shouldnt they be allowed to stop for that if they can for seatbelts?

I just dont understand how they can seperate it like that.

Sorry for the Typo's I didnt notice it until I hit enter... Im sorry.

Answer 1

1. The government realizes that many kids that age smoke anyway, and though not everyone does, it realizes that others could make that argument, so they're making smaller laws, hoping to improve upon them later, instead of having the whole thing taking away
2. Yeah, have to concede that point : /
3. Yes, but this helps some, and prevents, say, an aunt who smokes that is babysitting the kids from smoking while driving in the car.
4. that's kinda iffy. if not worn, seatbelts would endanger your lives.
smoking does, but theres no law against that, so.. D:
Hope this helps! ;)

Answer 2

Why is it that men and women that do not smoke wish to control those who do? Who put you answerable for others lives. Let me guess, you bought in anybody's car and so they started smoking. If you happen to have been that concerned about it you could have simply gotten out. This can't be about pollution given that the car pollutes extra in 1 minute than smoking a entire p.C. Will do. Thanks to men and women that go on the ban wagon about 3 bars and a pair of restaurants with the aid of me have long past out of industry. Some men and women that don't drink may believe that is just right however what about all of the folks that closing these places hurt? The bartenders, waitresses, cook, busboys, supply men and women. Additionally the people that provided them delivery drivers, print retail outlets the record goes on. All these individuals have households. Of direction you do not care in regards to the owners of the places, they invested their lives right into a business that's tough to make a benefit from. Some had taken years to head from getting further into debt to beginning to make a profit. There used to be one new job over it though, the liquor retailer had to rent an extra individual however just for the weekends. I know, we must ban whatever that isn't trendy. In case you do not fit into the mildew then you'll be arrested fined and imprisoned. Here is the new list of matters we should make unlawful moreover to smoking. Being homosexual getting historical being too skinny being too fats being too short being too tall being the improper religion being the flawed color Wait this is sounding familiar like they did this in the past. Hmmmm

Answer 3

I agree, the government is going crazy. It's like here in california they passed the seatbelt law. Now I've been pulled over maybe 4-5 times and cited. So what's my complaint? The time officers are taking to write these tickets they could be out on patrol catching drunk drivers and people speeding.

Answer 4

Why is it that individuals who do not smoke opt to regulate those that do? Who placed you in fee of others lives. enable me wager, you acquire in a persons' automobile and they began smoking. in case you've been that fearful about it you'll have only gotten out. this received't be about toxins because the vehicle pollutes more desirable in a million minute than smoking an entire %. will do. with the aid of those who pass on the ban wagon about 3 bars and 2 eating places by technique of me have lengthy gone out of agency. some those who do not drink might want to imagine that's sturdy yet what about each and every of the individuals who last those places harm? The bartenders, waitresses, practice dinner, busboys, delivery human beings. also the individuals who offered them delivery drivers, print shops the record is going on. those sorts of human beings have households. for sure you do not care about the proprietors of the places, they invested their lives right into a agency that's hard to make a earnings on. some had taken years to pass from getting further into debt to starting off to make a earnings. there replaced into one new pastime over it although, the liquor save had to employ an additional desirable human being yet only for the weekends. i recognize, we ought to continuously ban something that could no longer prevalent. in case you do not in good structure into the mould then you will be arrested fined and imprisoned. the following is the hot record of issues we ought to continuously make unlawful to boot to smoking. being gay growing older being too skinny being too fat being too short being too tall being the incorrect faith being the incorrect colour Wait that's sounding commonly used like they did this in the previous. Hmmmm

Answer 5

the GOV is just trying to see how far they can go in trying to control it's people and take their rights away if they actually pass this than why don't they just make tobacco illegal ,oh that's right because most of the politicians get fat pockets from this particular industry it's getting crazy out there..... they should steak out the convience stores and start arresting the people who buy cigarrettes just like they do to the men who try to hire prostitutes god what's next

Answer 6

The government can't afford to make cigarettes illegal. The loss of tax revenue is the motivation to keep them legal ( at least to buy).They want their cake and eat it too.