DID Iraq having anything to do with 9/11???

Question

Who started what Mr. bush?

Answer 1

NO. Had nothing at all to do with 9/11. Most of the terrorists came from Saudi Arabia. Funny how things happen in'it?

Answer 2

Lucky chucky above may be lucky but dumb as fence post.No steel will not melt from a little kerosene fire. Try 10000 Gals. for hours and see what happens. How did you come up with that time of 90 seconds for building collapse. You should really stay away from all those far left cook web sites for a while. And no, Irak did not ditrectly have anything to do with 9/11

Answer 3

Depends on your definition of "having anything to do with". Direct connection? No, no real connection.
If you mean by "having anything to do with" that Iraq has been for some time a nation that espoused a hatred of the U.S., stirred up activism against the U.S. and provided a safe haven for terrorists and terrorist training facilities, repeatedly thumbed their noses at the U.S. and United Nation resolutions decided upon after the first Gulf War (which put them, effectively in a cease-fire condition [the terms of which they violated, giving the U.S. grounds for re-invasion]) including firing at U.S. planes flying overhead which created a general sense in the terrorist organizations that the U.S. was weak and could be stepped all over without fear of retaliation -- then, yes, I think they had something to do with it.

Answer 4

Sheeple People who refuse to accept the fact that the Bush administration Orchestrated the Terror Attacks of 911 are just plain ignorant. It's impossible for Jet fuel or Kerosene to melt iron...LOOK AT THE PERIODIC TABLE OF ELEMENTS. Also if the floors collapsed causing a chain reaction it would have taken well over 90 seconds for the buildings to come down. They came down at free fall speed....9 seconds. There is no logical argument here. Explosives were pre-planted in the building. Case closed! Why are so many people having a hard time accepting this?

Answer 5

Amen to that.
He started this war based on a lie. The country that produced most of the hijackers for 9/11 is still his best pals. Remember he is on tape holding hands with one of the Saudi princes. His father and the family of the man who orchestrated the attack on us have been friends for over 20 years. We see how hard they are looking for him.
After all the linking they did to get 9/11 and Saddam, he finally said that Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11. Way to go

Answer 6

Yeah totally agree with all the people saying yes. Uh...I mean....they have..uh...WMD. Yeah that's it. Proven wrong again.
Well Bin Laden was responsible for 9/11. Just because he took credit for it, the CIA announced that they had no HARD EVIDENCE to link it to him. That's strike 3 Mr. Bush. Yooooooooouuuuuuuurrrrrrr OUT.(well, we can pray for that).

Answer 7

Direct inivolvement, No, but they did harbor terrorist camps in that country, so it was indirect! But you will here differently from those people that won't admit it, like those that keep saying that WMD's weren't found when they were (Chemical and Biological)! They hate anything that has to do with the facts!

Answer 8

No it did not. Bush started the war in Iraq.

Answer 9

No, this has been confirmed by President Bush himself, twice as I remember. It remains a sticking point because of double speak from the Administration and from sources like Faux News.

Answer 10

Absolutely not, Bush just sent the American soldiers into that country because he wanted to show his daddy that he is a good boy and a big, strong man because that dude( rest in peace) tried to kill his daddy.