English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm not anti-american or something like that. I just wonder why your governants think that they are the only ones who can have nuclear bombs... you know, thinks liek that.

I am againt of all kind of bombs, weapons in general. Therefore, I want the Middle East countries and the Asian ones to stop making such things on their lands and under sea.

But it is the same case for your country! Why the U.N. do not say to U.S. "unmake" (if this word really exists!) the ones it has. And we all know that it has hundreds of nuclear materials...

Ok. Tnx for answering.


ie - b r a z i l

2007-02-14 04:44:55 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

16 answers

Because they said so.
Because they can.

But the bad news is... LOTS of people have these things. That is how the government is able to scare so many people .. by telling us everyone else has nuclear weapons. This is, of course, after The Bushes and Clintons and the Saudi Royals and the Cheneys etc ... have made their money selling them the stuff in the first place.

True evil knows no boundaries.

The judicious use of bombing is one way the Illuminati plan to wipe out both the Christians and the Muslims in one fell swoop. The same people are arming both sides with this end in sight.

They are instigating a war of ideologies and corporate greed in which they not only get richer, they continue to polarize the human race. Eventually someone will blow and there will be massive loss of life. This is what they are doing with the creation of Israel. They hide behind the Jewish people but use everyone to their own selfish goals.

Then they can bring in the NWO and its adherence to Lucifer more easily. The UN is not worth much now. It will not gain in true importance until the world is united under one bank in the NWO.

"The velvet glove of the steel fist" is what they call the UN forces.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1526462573111576587

2007-02-14 04:52:05 · answer #1 · answered by Noor al Haqiqa 6 · 0 2

save in innovations, the U. S. used 2 atomic bombs sixty 5 years in the past, none because. It shows how a lot they're many times depended on with them. are you able to are saying an identical about North Korea or Iran? North Korea threatened nuclear war only a pair weeks in the past. Iran has made threats of wiping Israel off the map. Pakistan and India almost got here to nuclear war 10 years in the past. the U. S. isn't the in elementary words usa that desires North Korea to renounce that's nukes. Iran's friends are hoping the U. S. or Israel does something to be particular it would not get them.

2016-11-03 10:48:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We arent the only country with nuclear. Many countries have nuclear power for electricity and remember its only a few more steps from electricity to bombs. Thats why we are worried about Iran.

2007-02-14 05:51:54 · answer #3 · answered by elaeblue 7 · 0 0

In the first place, you need to check your facts. Many nations, including China and Russia have a nuclear arsenal.
I will try to answer your question in one simple, easy-to-understand phrase:
Strength through potential power.
The US does not maintain this capability for primarily offensive cause. It is for defensive purposes. Many years of holding such weapons at bay when we very well could have used them proves this theory.
The question you should be asking: Are you ready to trust such nations as Iran or North Korea to be so even-handed and sensible with weapons so vicious as to be able to exterminate all of mankind? When was the last time you heard about an AMERICAN homicide bomber eager to obliterate himself to make a political statement?
The UN has no power to dictate to the US or any other nation. It has proven to be outdated, corrupt, and toothless.
Think about it!

2007-02-14 05:03:37 · answer #4 · answered by Dr. J 3 · 0 2

Well, none of the nuclear powers, Russia, China, United Kingdom, France, India, Pakistan, (Israel - not officially) and the US, want anyone else to have it. The big powers have kept each other in check, but small desperate states, like North Korea might not so easily be checked or deterred from actually using one. And unfortunately we (us folks caught in the middle) can't really trust any government to disarm. So who goes first?

2007-02-14 04:55:27 · answer #5 · answered by Archie K 2 · 1 2

Many nations currently possess nuclear weapons, as evidenced by previous posts. My answer to your specific question, and it is my opinion only, is to suggest that, if you possessed something of great value, something powerful that would cause others to regard you with awe and trepidation, would you want anyone else to possess the same thing, or would you want to keep it entirely to yourself, especially since some of those who could gain possession of that same power would not be as responsible or circumspect about it? Think about this, and answer to yourself honestly, not as you think your friends, or those whose influence you follow would have you to answer.

2007-02-14 05:21:35 · answer #6 · answered by dkiller88 4 · 0 1

No one should have Nuclear Weapons. Besides the environmental damage they can do they also happen to be the most tactically inefficient weapons on the face of the earth. the only real purpose they serve is to frighten other nations into submission.

2007-02-14 04:48:35 · answer #7 · answered by negimagi195 2 · 2 2

What do you base your question on? The only countries the US is against possessing nuclear weapons are those who threaten to USE them. And who gives a f*ck about the UN?

2007-02-14 04:59:08 · answer #8 · answered by Rabbit 3 · 0 2

Since when did we become the only country with nuclear weapons....that is the stupidest thing I have heard all morning. Get your facts straight before posting this garbage on here

2007-02-14 04:54:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Because we were the first country to have them, and we will only use them if they are used against us...we are more responsible than countries like Iran and North Korea, who would use them to gain more power...if we wanted to we could turn Iran and North Korea into a parking lot, but we don't...Boa tarde....

2007-02-14 04:50:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers