2007-02-14 04:10:54 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
No.. we'd have to hang our leaders.. Wouldn't that be awful :-P
2007-02-14 04:26:10 · update #1
Only those who use those weapons to kill their own people, declare that the holocaust never happened, state that they would like to wipe Israel off the map, and/or use those weapons in western countries' mass transit systems, water and food supply systems, places where large amounts of civilians gather, etc., etc., etc. Hmmm.....I think these people are referred to as TERRORISTS or PPL WHO HARBOR TERRORISTS.
2007-02-14 04:18:27 · answer #1 · answered by sophia 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
actually hang everyone accused of having them when they really dont. This is good because we are off the hook. It leaves Iran on the hook, we could invade syria too.
2007-02-14 13:11:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course we should, but only AFTER we've used them for our own purposes and we no longer feel we should keep an alliance with him or her.
2007-02-14 12:36:14 · answer #3 · answered by aerbare 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, those who use them to kill their own people and commit attrocities to humanity. And NO bush is not one of these people you damn libs, he is not a dictator nor is he a treasonous war crime committing america destroyer, sending soldiers to war is not the same as killing his own people en masse.
2007-02-14 12:26:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
no, just those who use them against their own people.
2007-02-14 12:19:31 · answer #5 · answered by slabsidebass 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We hung one: Saddam.
WMD's are not the problem. The problem is whose hands they are in.
2007-02-14 12:15:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Depends on what they do with those weapons.
2007-02-14 12:27:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no becuase then we'd have to hang ourselves
2007-02-14 12:13:51 · answer #8 · answered by hanntastic 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋