Areas with prostitution.
Same area with marijauna bar. You have to smoke in on premesis. The roach would be measured and put in a cigarette holder.
X, XX, XXX rated movie houses and peep shows.
Non paid for tv (CBS, NBC, ABC) would also be unsexualized and less violence put on. And the sin city would not be in city limits, but off on its own. Kind of like its own town? Would you vote for a law like that?
2007-02-14 02:38:51 · 9 answers · asked by ALunaticFriend 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Amsterdam has the highest crime rate in Europe, can you imagine how bad that would be here in the US where we can have guns? So you are for censorship? What is wrong with allowing every household to decide what they watch and what they don't? No I would not vote for such a controlling law or program.
2007-02-14 02:46:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
sure, I would set up shop there too. Bout time the government just let people live the way they want and quit pushing their christian extremist views on the general population. But, a better solution would just move to Netherlands they already have a similar setup. The use of all drugs in the Netherlands is lower than any other EU nation and the USA, their crime rate is also the lowest.
2007-02-14 02:44:40 · answer #2 · answered by jwk227 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why not take it a step further? In addition to "sex town" you could have "black town" and "china town" and "mexican town" and and "white people town". Then you could have "fast food town" and "nice restaurant town" and "bar town" and "gas station town". But only make those towns available to certain types of other towns. Then maybe you could build walls to separate them all from each other. Maybe throw up a little barb wire and hire guards from each town to keep other people from getting in or out. How does that sound?
2007-02-14 02:45:41 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
by technique of landing in a abandoned area, the occupants have time to get the "lay of the land" and set up a base of operations without being interfered with by technique of the locals, and without doing any harm or killing everybody. yet in all seriousness, they're attempting to stay away from the papperazi. they have already had too a lot undesirable publicity in the tabloids.
2016-11-03 10:31:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Excellent idea. At least that way all the sickoes would be out of town and all together in a group.
2007-02-14 02:43:49 · answer #5 · answered by Lou 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How about we just follow the spirit of the Constitution and let people do what they want to with their bodies in the privacy of their own homes, hmm?
2007-02-14 03:06:09 · answer #6 · answered by leftist1234 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How bout we vote for the people that will allow us to do what we please so long as it doesn't hurt anyone where ever we want.
Vote Libertarian.
2007-02-14 02:48:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you feeling like watching it, watch it. If you feel like killing it, kill it. Whatever you feel like doing, do it. Just don't whine on Judgement Day!
"GOD...REPAYETH THEM THAT HATE HIM TO THEIR FACE" Deut. 7:9-10
2007-02-14 03:00:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
No thanks. I'll pass.
2007-02-14 02:42:11 · answer #9 · answered by sjsosullivan 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋