Why do Republicans that still support Bush get their tails in a braid when the truth is brought out?

Question

Gee - Where are those weopons of mass destruction that Bush & Co. drilled into America's head, on a daily basis, were being stockpiled in Iraq???

Answer 1

It appears their whole world view is predicated on Bush's lies. If they stop to examine the lies, their world view shatters. That's an uncomfortable position to be in.

It's like getting people to face that their religion is a bunch of (lovely) reworked sumerian and egyptian pagan myths. No matter the evidence presented, it's a trick of the devil, or god kept trying and no one would listen until the Jews.

Answer 2

the story has changed so many times its pathetic.
1st. The war began because of 9/11. then changed to..
2nd. WMD's were located in iraq, (which the white house admitted was untrue), then..
3rd. Saddam was linked with Al Quada (which again the W.H said was not true.
4th. We have to stay because it is to dangerous for america to leave, the terrorists would just follow us here. then
5th. We have to stay and help build a government in Iraq.

Ok the Bush adm had admitted they found NO WMD's in Iraq.
The Bush adm admitted that saddam was not linked with Al Quada and 9/11.
When all of that fell through then it was to dangerous to leave because the terrorists would follow us back over here. ( do you people not think they already know the way over here? they have to wait and follow the US troops back to find america? Do you think that Iraq has all of the terrorist and there are no terrorists anywhere else in the world?) If there was a terrorist problem with america dont you think if they were going to attack america they would do it while all the attention is on iraq?

But they all change their storys and directions when another lie has unfolded. its a never ending story with them..

EDIT: I have noticed that most who has answered this question about the WMD's speak of the gulf war.. not this war.. interesting interesting..

Answer 3

I find it interesting that you, along with the rest of the "No WMD" crowd conveniently forget that over 500 chemical weapons have been found with the potential to kill thousands. I guess to your way of thinking only killing 10-15 thousand isn't MASS enough, right?

Answer 4

Your intelligence floors me. I truly would like to know what you are a veteran of. Do you remember the 1st Gulf War? If so then you might recall that our troops were exposed to chemical weapons, I don't know about you but that qualifies as WMD in my book. Just because you don't see them does not mean that they do not exist! I support our president & military 100%!

Answer 5

Soo Bush brain washed and tricked Hillary et al. Let me ask you- will N Korea or Putin ever try to trick anyone as well? Pathetic that you see your potential leaders as victims. Some leaders.

Answer 6

It doesn't matter whether there were WMD or not. In the final analysis Bush is not accountable to the people. As long as he doesn't lie to congress about getting a BJ he can do whatever he wants for the next two years.

Answer 7

You really believe that Saddam had ZERO weapons of mass destruction? No chemical, biological, nor nuclear weapons of any kind?

Answer 8

Did Bill and Hillary Clinton lie when they talked about regime change and Saddam's WMDs?

If you can't say so, then you should just change your name to "Libby Hypocrite".

Answer 9

they had them,they used them,we destroyed some of them.
nothing from nothing,but what were you? a general in the salvation army?

Answer 10

Oh, my turn. Why don't you Jump off a cliff? Why do you support a socialist candidate?