She has only a few years Senate experience. Sure, she was around the whitehouse, but many people have been "around the whitehouse." She's never held comparable elected office prior to being a Senator. She went to law school, but many women do that. Is she only the "front runner" because she can raise the money to be? Is it not about being qualified?
Even Barak Hussein Obama has more direct legislative public policy experience than Hillary.
2007-02-13 23:35:09 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Her policy experience while 1st lady consisted of an utterly disastrous "universal healthcare" proposal. Is policy failure really a feather in her cap?
2007-02-14 03:35:10 · update #1
Oh she has experience, but I have a long memory. I don't want that criminal left wing socialist as my president.
2007-02-13 23:54:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
She doesn't have any qualities to qualify her to get the job. In fact, everything about her should disqualify her. She is a Socialist, an egomaniac and there are some serious psychological issues that she has that are scary. She has no clue as to what it takes to fix the health care system. Her ideas were a total failure. Her idea on the public schools is a total failure. Her attitude of " it takes a village " is outright Communism by definition and not just an opinion. But then that is why the far left like her. She is part Socialist and part Communist and loathes the military. That part is pretty much public record. She while first woman, (she ain't no lady) wanted the Marine Guard to not wear their uniform at the White House. She felt it was an embarrassment. She is for the reduction of all military and to weaken the U.S. forces and prefers the U.N. to protect our land. I guess when she was first woman and making statements she figured people would forget all of this by the time she ran for president. She is for this One World Govt. crap and wants to sell us all down the crapper. There are hundreds of things that disqualify this banshee as President of the United States.
2007-02-13 23:57:10 · answer #2 · answered by celticwarrior7758 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The only qualifications needed for President is 1. natural born citizen and 2. be over the age of 35. Hillary is a natural born citizen and she is well over the age of 35.
Hillary has 7 years of the senate under he belt and Obama has eight. Ewww, big difference. While being First Lady isn't an elected position it is an important position that helps shape public policy. Hillary is one of many First Ladies that had political and policy making influence while their husbands were in office. She was partner in a law firm, led the American Bar Association's Commision on Women, twice named one of 100 most influential lawyers, etc.
What exactly were/are Bush's "qualifications"?
2007-02-14 01:28:05 · answer #3 · answered by MI 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary has more going for her than Bush has: Bush highlights:
Phillips Academy (Andover, Massachusetts)
Yale University (New Haven, Connecticut)
Harvard University (Cambridge, Massachusetts)
Career highlights
CANDIDATE United States House of Representatives (1978)
Governor of Texas (1995-2000)
2007-02-14 00:23:28 · answer #4 · answered by Debra D 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
we opt to thank the Media for putting a Circus for this guy and create the Obama Church - look Gov. Richardson replaced into babtized on Friday and sounds like Judas at the same time with his beard (even he did not help Hillary, he must have stayed impartial out of appreciate to his ex-boss bill Clinton - No loyalty!) Richardson has gotten this some distance with the aid of Clinton bringing him in his administration in the 90s.
2016-11-03 10:18:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Finally, an intelligent question. She is not qualified. Dirty money that is backing her, from liberal donations to her husbands' crew, it's money that will keep her campaign strong. Wake up people, she was a war protester fanatic that even today, she despises the military. If she is elected, this country's security will be for the taken.
2007-02-14 00:03:24 · answer #6 · answered by tim g 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Nothing! She has no conviction. She is what the poles are at the time & that is scary. I may not agree with your politics, but if you believe what you think & can lead, I at least respect you. My husband had lunch with her last month & Hilary has no idea what is going on in the middle east & she doesn't want to believe the notion that we are at war. She thinks that was then & now it's time to move on. Hello!, our enemy will never give up & they'll keep comming at us because they want to control the oil in the mid-east & then convert the west to islam. I'm sorry,but I don't want my daughter growing up in a burka. In addition, she says for women rights but wants to get out of Iraq! Standard Hiliary BS talking out of both mouths.
2007-02-13 23:57:00 · answer #7 · answered by Minilover 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
She was already president for eight years. Bill just got a nice jet to fly around in, all the weed he could smoke and all the trashy whores he could bang. Why not get past the formalities and let her really do it.
Wait....hell no. We must stop the Hilldabeast!
2007-02-13 23:40:31 · answer #8 · answered by Damn Good Dawg 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
The only qualifications she has is that she can get Bill into a skirt while barking like a dog while being whipped all at the same time.
2007-02-13 23:46:20 · answer #9 · answered by tatslady2 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Experience doesn't make you a great president. Not much qualified Abe Lincoln and he did an alright job.
This election, I think it is going to hurt you more to be tangled up in this congressional/presidential disaster.
2007-02-13 23:44:46 · answer #10 · answered by plant a tree 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The fact that she was in the white house for 8 years is pretty damn good.
2007-02-14 03:18:36 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋