Who is better?

Who is better TODAY? - Batista.
Undertaker has an infinitely more impressive career, however.

Although, I have to comment on the guy who said Taker's last WM wins 'reads like a who's who of wrestling' Let's test that....

1. Mark Henry - One 'main event' push that was never really that big, spent most of his career as a midcarder at best
2. Randy Orton - Former Champ, legit example
3. Kane - The most over-estimated in my opinion. Kane is an allright example, but the two have gone back and forth so many times over the years...
4. Big Show & A Train - Big Show is a boneified star... A-Train, not so much. I'd have been more impressed if he beat ONLY the Big Show and not both. This was one of those matches where you MORE then knew Taker would win
5. Ric Flair - Flair is possibly the greatest of all time, can't take anything away here
6. HHH - Another 'great' So far your comment about a who's who of wrestling isn't looking bad
7. Big Boss Man - A mid-carder, at best
8. Kane - AGAIN?
9. Psycho Sid - I GUESS Sid WAS World Champ, but I regard him more on a Kane level
10. Diesel - Kevin Nash wasn't 'World Champ' level until after he dropped the gimmick
11. King Kong Bundy - Recognizable name but... never really top tier
12. The Giant Gonzolez - Renown as one of the worst of all time
13. Jake Roberts - Again, with Bundy, a 'big' name that was never top tier

So while Taker's wins have certainly been impressive, the only 'top guys' I count on the list is HHH. Arguments could be made for Orton (wasn't at prime at the time), Big Show, Kane, and Ric Flair (way past prime at time) for other 'top tier' guys.

Where's a win against a Stone Cold Steve Austin, Hulk Hogan, The Rock, or Bret Hart? If he had a couple more of those his streak would be 40 times more impressive.

2007-02-14 02:13:41 · answer #1 · answered by John C 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋

Batista is the go-to guy,but 'Taker is a legend and Batista will be facing the toughest task of his career so far,which is to hand the Undertaker his first Wrestlemania loss in fifteen of these events. I think that even though Batista won't be intimidated by 'Taker's 14-0 record at Wrestlemania, he will be thinking about that and wondering if he will become victim number 15 ,which reads like a who's who of wrestling.

2007-02-14 07:43:25 · answer #2 · answered by Navy613 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋

Taker. Batista can Rest In Peace!

2007-02-14 09:13:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋

Taker

2007-02-14 07:30:25 · answer #4 · answered by Afi 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋

Taker 100%.

2007-02-14 07:28:09 · answer #5 · answered by Crush06 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋

If you ask for my opinion, I would say The Undertaker because he is a legend.However, it will be an interesting match this wrestlemania. Batista is not weak and will put up a fight.But the fact that Undertaker never lost at Wrestlemania has convinced me that the dead man will win.Taker has beaten ric flair,kane and many more on this very event.

2007-02-14 09:32:08 · answer #6 · answered by anchit k 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋

Personally i like the Undertaker better than Batista, but everyone has their own opinion on who they like in the business.

2007-02-14 07:28:21 · answer #7 · answered by Sweet Sacrifice 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋

Undertaker. He has way more experiance and has a height advantage. They both are power houses, but Undertaker knows the ropes more. Plus the rateings would go through the roof if Undertaker won.

2007-02-14 10:06:20 · answer #8 · answered by Wes 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋

taker batista is anther cena and very over rated and plus needed steriods to get to where he is

2007-02-14 07:55:07 · answer #9 · answered by crazziegrl14 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋

batista
i know im da only 1 dat saz him but it is tru people dont want to see taker lose

2007-02-14 10:44:32 · answer #10 · answered by gabe j 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋

17 answers