Dog.
2007-02-13 23:08:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Stewed dog with saffron, a light coconut cream sauce, onions, garlic, and some beef stock, poured over a steaming bowl of basmati rice. Served with a Chateau d'blanc '87.
2007-02-14 07:10:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by ookaninam2000 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
A cat, because the wood's better off without one, and it'll run away later if I need to eat a second animal. I'd eat a loyal dog last.
2007-02-14 07:09:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Benvenuto 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
if you had a dog or a cat with you and u are without food, the to animals with u will be hungry, so they will die so no food. but if you find a dog or a cat, run after it to see where it gets its food.
so there is no use of eating anyone of them.
2007-02-14 07:10:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anthony 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Neither. I would find plants, berries, grass, anything else growing -- I could probably eat bugs before I could eat dog or cat meat.
2007-02-14 07:19:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by girlnamedmaria 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
those animals will die first before you can eat them because humans can stay alive longer than other animals....
if i were to eat a dog or cat, i'd eat the cat 'coz dogs are more useful to humans.... have you ever seen a CAT sniffing bombs???
2007-02-14 07:13:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by 53283663 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
well, some of the chinese eat dogs as they think it is good to warm the body during winter...so i think i will choose dogs rather than cats...
2007-02-14 07:32:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by ~~simply me~~ 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wouldn't be able to eat either one I'd just gag and starve
2007-02-14 07:15:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by laney 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
A cat. I hate those lazy losers.
2007-02-14 07:17:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't think either would seem like food to me
2007-02-14 07:10:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by OOGLY 4
·
2⤊
0⤋